Insight,

China Adopts Higher Thresholds for Merger Filings

US | EN
Current site :    US   |   EN
Australia
China
China Hong Kong SAR
Japan
Singapore
United States
Global

Fewer mergers in China will require regulatory notification and clearance, after the government significantly increased turnover thresholds – including by doubling the figure for China earnings. This does not always mean less scrutiny: the regulator remains strict on ‘killer acquisitions’, and mergers that may restrict or exclude competition might still need notification – even if they don’t meet thresholds.

In this insight, we share highlights from the new notification standards.

The State Council published the new standards on 26 January 2024; officially titled the Provisions of the State Council on the Standard for Notification of Concentration of Business Operators (2024 Amendment) (New Thresholds for Notification). This was passed by the State Council on 29 December 2023, to take effect on 26 January 2024.

Turnover thresholds are significantly increased

The New Thresholds for Notification have significantly increased the turnover thresholds for merger filings. Specifically, any concentration that meets the following thresholds must be notified to and cleared by the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) prior to closing[1]:

Article 3, New Thresholds for Notification.

Original Standard
New Standard
Example uses 2

The worldwide total turnover of all concentrating parties exceeds RMB10 billion in the preceding fiscal year, and at least two concentrating parties in China each has a turnover of more than RMB400 million, or

The China-wide total turnover of all concentrating parties exceeds RMB2 billion in China in the preceding fiscal year, and at least two concentrating parties in China each has a turnover of more than RMB400 million

The worldwide total turnover of all concentrating parties exceeds RMB12 billion (approx. USD1.70 billion/ EUR1.57 billion) in the preceding fiscal year, and at least two concentrating parties in China each has a turnover of more than RMB800 million (approx. USD113.53 million / EUR104.68 million), or

The China-wide total turnover of all concentrating parties exceeds RMB4 billion (approx. USD567.76 million / EUR523.39 million) in the preceding fiscal year, and at least two concentrating parties in China each has a turnover of more than RMB800 million (approx. USD113.53 million / EUR104.68 million)

It is worth noting that the draft for public consultation of the New Thresholds for Notification introduced a set of notification standards that targeted killer acquisitions. Specifically, the draft required notifying to SAMR any transaction that satisfies the following conditions:

  • The Chinese turnover of one of the concentrating parties exceeds RMB100 billion (approx. USD14.19 billion / EUR13.08 billion) in the preceding fiscal year, and
  • The market capitalization (or valuation) of the merging party or the target company is not less than RMB800 million (approx. USD113.53 million / EUR104.68 million), and its turnover in China in the preceding fiscal year accounted for more than one-third of its global turnover.

The published version of the New Thresholds for Notification has not adopted the above thresholds, which might be because there are controversies over how to determine the market capitalization or valuation of an enterprise. Therefore whether a concentration has met filing thresholds would be uncertain. Nevertheless, the above thresholds reflect SAMR’s strict scrutiny over “killer acquisitions” in China, which are also consistent with the global trend.

Transactions that do not meet filing thresholds but may exclude or restrict market competition may also be subject to merger filings

The New Thresholds for Notification emphasizes that if there is evidence to prove that a concentration of undertakings has or may have the effect of excluding or restricting competition, the antitrust enforcement administration could require notification even if it has not met the filing thresholds as promulgated by the State Council.[2]

In determining which circumstances could be deemed as having the effect of excluding or restricting competition, the Antimonopoly Guidelines in the Field of Platform Economy (Guidelines for Platform Economy) and the Antimonopoly Guidelines in the Field of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (Guidelines for API) published and implemented in 2021 provide the following guidance:

Article 4, New Thresholds for Notification.

Relevant Guidelines
Specific Circumstances in which a concentration of undertakings has not met the turnover thresholds but may exclude or restrict competition
Example uses 2

Guidelines for Platform Economy[3]

Article 19(3), Guidelines for Platform Economy.

  • a party to the concentration is a start-up enterprise or new platform;
  • a party to the concentration adopts a free or low-cost sales model, resulting in a low turnover;
  • high degree of concentration in the relevant market; and
  • few competitors in the relevant market

Article 19(3), Guidelines for Platform Economy.

Article 19(3), Guidelines for Platform Economy.

Guidelines for APl

Article 19(3), Guidelines for Platform Economy.

  • only a small number of undertakings are active in the relevant APl market
  • there is a high degree of concentration of the relevant market, and
  • there is significant combined market share of the parties

Article 19(3), Guidelines for Platform Economy.

Article 19(3), Guidelines for Platform Economy.

Application time

The New Thresholds for Notification will apply to transactions for which the agreements are signed after January 26, 2024. For transactions signed before January 26, 2024, but not yet implemented, there has not been formal guidance on the applicability of the new standard. We would suggest a case-by-case assessment and a pre-filing consultation with SAMR if necessary.

Reference

  • [1]

    Article 3, New Thresholds for Notification.

  • [2]

    Article 4, New Thresholds for Notification.

  • [3]

    Article 19(3), Guidelines for Platform Economy.

REGULATIONS AND LAWS IN CHINA

Our KWM International Center experts are closely watching the market and sharing our insights on selected PRC regulatory shifts and trends.

LATEST THINKING
Publication
On March 18, 2025, the renowned legal know-how provider Practical Law under Thomson Reuters published the updated version of “AI-Generated Content and Copyright (China)” (2025 Note).

20 March 2025

Insight
As the revision of the Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China (“PRC Arbitration Law”) progresses, ad hoc arbitration is gaining more attention in China. Previously, there was discussion on whether ad hoc arbitration will truly take root in the country. Recently, there have been notable advancements in the adoption of practical rules surrounding ad hoc arbitration in certain regions while on the national level, there appears to be more of a cautious stance in expanding the scope of ad hoc arbitration. This article provides a brief summary of these developments, starting with a national perspective and discussion of the key issues regarding the draft amendments to the PRC Arbitration Law. The article then ends with an overview of regional efforts to introduce ad hoc arbitration, including initiatives under the current regional system in Shanghai.dispute resolution and litigation-domestic arbitration

14 March 2025

Insight
On January 12, 2025, the Guangdong Provincial Government introduced the Measures for High-Quality Development of Capital Markets to Support Guangdong’s Modernization (the “Measures”). These Measures lay out a detailed framework aimed at strengthening Guangdong’s multi-tiered capital markets, boosting tech-driven enterprises, and improving the overall quality of listed companies. The overarching goal is to position Guangdong as leading financial hub and embrace innovation to attract global investment.

07 March 2025