Insight,

Tracking recent Hong Kong bankruptcy judgments

HK | EN
Current site :    HK   |   EN
Australia
China
China Hong Kong SAR
Japan
Singapore
United States
Global

Authors: Barbara Chiu (Partner), Nichole Hou (Counsel), Henry Cheung (Senior Associate)

With growing competition and global market uncertainties in recent years, businesses may experience operational and financial challenges, resulting in debt defaults. A creditor is entitled to petition for the bankruptcy and liquidate the debtor's assets in order to try to achieve a maximum recovery. Statistics published by the Official Receiver's Office noted 7,062 petitions for compulsory liquidation and bankruptcy between January and October 2019. In this client alert, we discuss two significant and recent judgments in respect of insolvency law given by the Hong Kong* courts.

1. Will the existence of an arbitration agreement affect the commencement of insolvency proceedings?

In the recent case of But Ka Chon v Interactive Brokers LLC [2019] HKCA 873, Hong Kong's Court of Appeal considered whether the right of a creditor to utilise bankruptcy and liquidation proceedings is limited by an arbitration clause in a debt-related contract. As many commercial agreements contain arbitration clauses, the judgment has important implications for creditors' rights and the relief available.

The agreement entered between the appellant (a client of a brokerage company, the debtor) and the respondent (a brokerage company, the creditor) provided that disputes between the parties should be resolved through arbitration. As the appellant did not repay the sums overdue in the margin account, the creditor applied for bankruptcy of the appellant in the Hong Kong Courts. The appellant sought to persuade the Court of Appeal to dismiss the statutory demand issued by the creditor, one of the grounds being that the parties had agreed to arbitration.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, taking the opportunity to consider the first instance judgment in Lasmos (Re Southwest Pacific Bauxite (HK) Ltd [2018] 2 HKLRD 449) in 2018. In Lasmos, the First Instance Court held that where three criteria are satisfied, unless there are exceptions, a creditor's winding up petition should generally be dismissed if:

  1. the company disputes the debt relied on by the petitioner;
  2. the contract under which the debt is alleged to arise contains an arbitration clause that covers any dispute relating to the debt; and
  3. the company takes the steps required under the arbitration clause to commence the contractually mandated dispute resolution process and files an affirmation in accordance with the winding up rules demonstrating this.

In But Ka Chon, although the Court of Appeal did not overrule Lasmos and acknowledged that the Court should follow the underlying policy in favour of arbitration, the Court of Appeal, as an obiter, queried whether the ruling in Lasmos would significantly limit the statutory right of a creditor to make use of bankruptcy and liquidation proceedings to protect its interests. In its ruling, the Court of Appeal held that, even if the principle in Lasmos was adopted, the appellant had failed to satisfy the third criterion above, namely, the appellant had not commenced arbitration proceedings. Hence, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appellant's appeal.

But Ka Chon implies that where parties already have an arbitration agreement in place, a creditor is still entitled to apply to the Courts for the liquidation or bankruptcy of the debtor. Hong Kong Courts have the discretion to stay or dismiss a petition for bankruptcy or liquidation and strike a balance between a creditor's protection of its own interests and respect for arbitration proceedings. Whether the debtor takes steps to commence the arbitration is an important consideration.

2. The Hong Kong Courts recognise for the first time a non-common law jurisdiction, namely Japanese bankruptcy proceedings

In Re Mr Kaoru Takamatsu [2019] HKCFI 802, the Hong Kong Courts, for the first time, recognised bankruptcy proceeding commenced in Japan, and vested the trustee in bankruptcy with equivalent powers under Hong Kong law, including the power to manage the assets of the bankrupt and to request documents from third parties. This precedent is conducive to the enforcement of a debtor's assets in Hong Kong by foreign trustees in bankruptcy or liquidators from non-common law jurisdictions.

In this judgment, the judge made reference to two criteria for the recognition of foreign bankruptcy proceedings by the Hong Kong Courts:

  1. the foreign bankruptcy proceeding requesting recognition must be commenced in the country of incorporation of the company or domicile of the individual; and
  2. the liquidation and bankruptcy laws of such country must be taken on behalf of creditors generally and have a similar insolvency regime to Hong Kong.

This case confirmed the similarities between the insolvency regime in the bankruptcy proceedings in Japan and Hong Kong. Since legal rights enjoyed by trustees in bankruptcy in the two jurisdictions were similar, the Hong Kong Court was willing to recognise the trustee in bankruptcy appointed by the Japanese Courts. This undoubtedly provides creditors from various civil law system countries a new way for enforcing debt security in Hong Kong.

KWM's global bankruptcy and restructuring group comprises a dedicated team of 150 lawyers across banking and finance, capital markets, dispute resolution and mergers and acquisitions. Drawing on KWM's global network, the team is experienced in acting for banks, multinational companies, administrators and other parties in bankruptcy and restructuring-related matters to help clients in achieving their business ambitions. Leveraging Hong Kong's well-established legal system and its status as a leading international financial centre has enabled KWM Hong Kong's bankruptcy and restructuring team to build a track record of cross-border bankruptcy and restructuring matters. The team's efforts in this space was recognised in the Asia Legal Business Hong Kong Law Awards 2019, where it won "Restructuring and Bankruptcy Law Firm of the Year".



*Any reference to "Hong Kong" or "Hong Kong SAR" shall be construed as a reference to "Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China".

LATEST THINKING
Insight
Investors in private equity funds who are negotiating fund terms with fund managers can improve the transparency of the private equity industry and the commercial terms on which they invest by actively advocating for stringent terms and changes in market standards to protect their own interests. Pro-active efforts by investors during negotiations are essential to maintain high standards of investor protection.

11 March 2025

Insight
The Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong (“SFC”) issued a circular on 17 February 2025, clarifying the requirements for closed-ended funds seeking a listing on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (“SEHK”). This marks the latest initiative by the Hong Kong government to broaden distribution channels for private equity funds, following the launch of the New Capital Investment Entrant Scheme (as discussed in our previous article) and the expansion of the tax concession regime for funds and single-family offices.

21 February 2025

Insight
Hong Kong has a rigorous licensing and compliance framework for virtual asset exchanges, as we summarised in our KWM 2023 Guide to VATP Licensing. The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has recently published fresh guidance on Hong Kong’s virtual asset trading platform (VATP) regime, in three key documents. These are as follows: Announcement: SFC’s extension of the swift licensing process to new VATP applicants (Swift Licensing Process). Circular: Circular to new VATP operators seeking to be licensed: enhanced licensing process and revamped external assessments (Updated Licensing and Assessments Circular). Circular: Circular on findings from inspections on deemed-to-be-licensed VATP applicants and expected standards of conduct for VATP operators (Expectations and Observations Circular). This article sets out a summary of these important materials. Please contact us if you have any questions about the VATP regime. We have supported several applicants and would be delighted to assist you.

14 February 2025