Insight,

The next wave of Hong Kong’s AML/CTF regime

HK | EN
Current site :    HK   |   EN
Australia
China
China Hong Kong SAR
Japan
Singapore
United States
Global

This article was written by Urszula McCormack and Alice Molan.

Ahead of a critical FATF mutual evaluation next year, two significant developments in Hong Kong's AML/CTF regime are underway. These primarily relate to corporate transparency (a G20 imperative) and the expansion of statutory controls to solicitors, accountants, real estate companies and trust and company service providers.

The changes plug important systemic gaps. They will also prove to be a shock for businesses and professions new to this degree of AML/CTF control.  However, the upside is that we now have significant experience from our role in financial sector reforms and high-profile investigations, as well as smarter compliance tools at our disposal.

This article describes the key reforms and action items.

Quick synopsis

Hong Kong has undertaken two consultations this year in respect of money laundering and counter terrorism ("ML/TF") controls. In April 2017, as a result of these consultations, The Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau ("FSTB") released its Consultation Conclusions on Legislative Proposals to Enhance Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Regulation in Hong Kong ("Consultation Conclusions").

There are five key proposed reforms:

five key proposed reforms

The following describes the key aspects of the proposals.

Further details

A. Hong Kong companies – enhanced transparency

In the ongoing wake of the Panama Papers, there is significant global policy support for increasing the transparency of the beneficial ownership of companies, for various reasons including stemming corruption and decreasing tax evasion. Proposals are already underway in several major markets.

In Hong Kong, the FSTB proposes that Hong Kong companies will be required to maintain a register of people with significant control of the company ("PCS Register").

Important: access limited

While the consultation had originally envisaged a public register, the Consultation Conclusions now propose only that the PCS Register must be available to competent authorities. This was a response to significant privacy concerns, including those raised by the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data. The FSIB has flagged that a centralised database may be launched in future (akin to the UK model), but this is off the cards for now.

Whose details must be on the PCS Register?

The PCS Register must include details of beneficial owners.

The definition of beneficial owners will capture persons with an interest of more than 25% in the company – the multi-pronged definition for determining whether a person has such an interest will take into account both direct and indirect interests in shares as well persons with certain influence or control over the company.

The following is an illustrative chart of who is caught:

PCS Register Charts

Reasonable steps must be taken

Companies will be required to take proactive steps to identify beneficial ownership information – the Consultation Conclusions describe that "reasonable steps" to identify beneficial owners may include reviewing corporate documents as well as serving notices on persons to provide information.

What information must be captured?

The following details will need to be captured for each registrable individual and entity, as applicable: 

Name of registrable individual or entity Identity document number and issuing country for passports 
Legal form of entity and registration number Date on which became a registrable individual or entity
Correspondence address and principal office address Nature of control over the company

Companies will also need to appoint a designated contact person for providing information about the PCS register and assisting with law enforcement enquiries.

How long must the information be kept?

Information will need to be retained for at least six years from the date a person ceases to be a registrable individual or entity.

This is a reduction from the original proposal of 10 years.

Penalties for non-compliance

Penalties will be imposed on companies that do not comply with PCS Register requirements as well any person who knowingly or recklessly makes a statement in the PSC register which is misleading, false or deceptive in any material particular.

B. Expanded scope of AML/CTF regulation

The second major reform is to Hong Kong's customer due diligence ("CDD") and record-keeping framework under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing (Financial Institutions) Ordinance (Cap.615) ("AMLO").

Specifically, this will be expanded to capture solicitors, accountants, real estate agents and TCSPs – but only when engaged in specified transactions. These entities are referred to as designated non-financial businesses and professions ("DNFBPs").

What are "specified transactions"?

"Specified transactions" are proposed to be broadly defined to include real estate transactions, management of client money, securities or other assets, management of bank, savings or securities accounts, company formation and management and buying and selling of business entities.

It is true that all DNFBPs are subject to general law requirements to avoid ML/TF, and some (such as solicitors) are subject to regulatory rules. However, the AMLO is a prescriptive regime that carries criminal liability (including for individuals) – it will require a significant uplift in policy and procedure for most firms.

Who is not caught?

Interestingly, the FSTB decided not to include dealers in precious metals and stones within the expanded AMLO framework, despite FATF recommendations.  

The rationale was two-fold:

  • industry feedback suggested that "cash transactions are no longer common in Hong Kong as in the old days"; and
  • the Hong Kong Police Force had indicated that there had been no convictions for money laundering in this sector between 2010 and 2015.

Anecdotally, we understand these views have been met with a degree of scepticism, and it may well be that this will be reviewed more closely by FATF.

Risk-sensitive approach to CDD

The Consultation Conclusions also flag that the application of CDD measures should be applied in the context of DNFBPs in a risk-sensitive approach, including the application of simplified due diligence to low-risk situations. We expect that there will be further work in each relevant DNFBP sector to consider the ML/TF risks posed in relevant DNFBP's businesses and formulating appropriate controls to address these risks.

As we know from our work on the AMLO and helping banks and other financial institutions on recent investigations, "risk-sensitive approach" does not connote as much flexibility as you think – it generally means higher standards, unless a very specific simplified due diligence scenario meets a statutory test.

AMLO at a glance

The following chart summarises the key aspects of the new regime.

AMLO at a glance

C. Amended beneficial ownership test

The third key proposal takes a step in a different direction – it is a relaxation of current beneficial ownership thresholds in the AMLO.

Briefly, the AMLO currently applies a 10% threshold to beneficial ownership – this means that persons who own or control 10% or more of a company's issued share capital, or are able to control 10% or more of the voting rights of the corporation at a general meeting, must be identified under CDD measures. Similar tests apply to other types of entities such as partnerships and trusts.

The Consultation Conclusions recognise that this 10% threshold is out of step with international standards, including FATF expectations. Accordingly, the FSTB propoies to remove the 10% threshold current and apply a 25% threshold instead. This is also consistent with the current verification threshold for low-risk clients.

This change will be welcomed by many financial institutions in Hong Kong, particularly those seeking to leverage global policies and procedures that already adopt a 25% threshold. However, interestingly, we have also heard counter-arguments from certain large financial institutions that preferred statutory backing to their (preferred) 10% approach from a risk perspective. Given that there are other AMLO amendment workstreams in play, it may be that there will be some further thought put to this

Timing

The Consultation Conclusions announce that new legislation is intended to be introduced into the Legislative Council by July 2017. However, until draft legislation is available, the timing for implementation is not clear.

Our current estimate is late Q4 2017/early Q1 2018, ahead of the FATF mutual evaluation.

Other reforms

There are numerous other reforms taking place in tandem with the Consultation Conclusions, including in relation to existing AMLO requirements, and enhancing practical implementation through things like KYC utilities and digital identity.

Watch this space.

What do you need to think about?

There are several key action items:

1. For all Hong Kong companies

Do you have the internal controls and procedures to:

  • identify beneficial persons;
  • obtain all the information required;
  • create a compliant PCS Register; and
  • maintain the reports?

Have you engaged with relevant stakeholders – including upstream shareholders etc – to ensure they are aware of the new rules and are prepared to provide the necessary details?

Are there any overseas data protections that you need to consider and address before implementation?

2. For financial institutions already regulated under the AMLO

  • What changes will you enact to your policy and procedure to reflect the change in beneficial ownership threshold to 25% (if any)?
  • Are there any new opportunities, risks or policy implications from the new regulation of DNFPBs? For example, does it change your risk assessments?

3. For business and professions to be captured under the new DNFPB rules

Start planning. The sooner the better. The critical things to consider are:

  • (early) senior management buy-in;
  • preparing for a licence application if you need one (TCSPs only);
  • building a strong control framework, with clear policies and procedures;
  • creating efficient and user-friendly systems;
  • ensuring adequate resourcing;
  • vendor support – for example, due diligence reports and technological tools; and
  • what advice you need from your professional advisers.

KWM's role

We continue to work closely with HKAB on various reforms (including these FSTB's proposals), as well as with our clients on their compliance programs.

We also recently concluded work on one of the recent high-profile AML/CTF investigations announced in Hong Kong. In this respect, in the time leading up to FATF's evaluation of Hong Kong, we are expecting a strong ongoing enforcement focus, as flagged in our 28 February 2017 alert and our recent global trends post on The Laundromat, our regulatory blog.

Please speak to us if you have any questions.

LATEST THINKING
Insight
The implementation of Security of Payment (“SOP”) legislation has been contemplated and debated in Hong Kong for decades. See our previous article, here, about what SOP legislation is and the pilot scheme that has been running in Hong Kong since December 2021. Yesterday, on May 16, the Development Bureau published the Construction Industry Security of Payment Bill (“SOP Bill”). The SOP Bill was gazetted today (May 17) and will be introduced into the LegCo for first reading on May 29. A copy of the SOP Bill, together with the LegCo Brief, is accessible here. The SOP Bill, once enacted, will have a significant impact on the Hong Kong construction industry, and will drive significant changes to how contracts are administered, how contractors, sub-contractors and suppliers are paid and how disputes are managed in Hong Kong.

20 May 2024

Publication
In this article, we examine the impacts of the new approval mechanism from the Hong Kong Education Bureau (EDB) for “Other Charges” set out in EDB Circular No. 15/2023, the Implementation Details and related documents.

20 May 2024

Publication
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (the “HKMA”) has extended its Green and Sustainable Finance Grant Scheme (the “GSF Grant Scheme”) for an additional three years, through 2027. Initially launched in May 2021, the GSF Grant Scheme supports the issuance of eligible green and sustainable bonds and loans in Hong Kong to foster the development of sustainable finance. The details of the extended GSF Grant Scheme were announced on 3 May 2024, with the updated guidelines for grant applications (the “2024 Updated Guidelines”) taking effect on 10 May 2024, the date of the extension. As with the original GSF Grant Scheme, the grants under the extended GSF Grant Scheme continue to consist of two tracks, covering: • General Bond Issuance Costs: This track covers 50% of eligible expenses with the caps maintained at either HK$2.5 million or HK$1.25 million (depending on whether the bond, issuer, or guarantor has a credit rating). • External Review Costs: This track covers the full cost of external review fees with an overall cap maintained at HK$800,000. The eligibility requirements are similar to those under the original GSF Grant Scheme, requiring, among others, the financial instruments to be issued in Hong Kong, the issuance size to be at least HK$1.5 billion for bond issuance cost grants or HK$100 million for external review cost subsidies, and a pre-issuance review by a recognised external reviewer. The key changes in the 2024 Updated Guidelines include: 1 Expansion of the Grant Scope: Transition bonds and loans have been added as eligible financial instruments. 2 Specific Caps for External Review Costs: Sub-caps for pre-issuance and post-issuance external review cost have been set on top of the original total cap. Applications for grants for bonds or loans issued from 10 May 2024 must follow the 2024 Updated Guidelines. The application procedure remains the same as in the original GSF Grant Scheme, where applications for bond issuance costs grants are to be submitted to the HKMA by the lead arrangers or lead lenders while applications for external review costs grants may be submitted by issuers or borrowers directly. Recognised arranger and recognised external reviewer statuses certified by the HKMA before 10 May 2024, will remain valid. Overview of the Hong Kong GSF Grant Scheme For easy reference, the below is an overview of the updated GSF Grant Scheme. For full details on the GSF Grant Scheme, please refer to the 2024 Updated Guidelines. 1. Eligible Instrument Types General Bond Issuance Costs Grant: Green, social, sustainability, sustainability-linked and transition bonds. External Review Costs Grant: Green, social, sustainability, sustainability-linked and transition bonds and loans. 2. Eligible Bond Issuers and Loan Borrowers General Bond Issuance Costs Grant: Eligible for first-time issuers who have not issued any green, social, sustainability, sustainability-linked, or transition bonds in Hong Kong within the five years preceding the eligible issuance, excluding such issuer acting as an arranger for the eligible bond issuance. External Review Costs Grant: Available to both first-time and repeated issuers and borrowers (each entity can apply for subsidy for two eligible loans at most ). 3. Criteria for Eligible Issuances For all applications: • Issued in Hong Kong: For bonds, at least half of the lead arrangers must have recognized arranger status by HKMA, and for loans, at least half of the loan amount must be provided by Hong Kong-based lenders. • Issuance Size: At least HK$1.5 billion for the bond issuance costs grant and HK$100 million for the external review costs grant. Applicable to bonds only: • Must be (i) lodged with and cleared by the Central Moneymarkets Unit (“CMU”) or (ii) listed on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the “HKEX”). • Issued, at issuance, to at least 10 persons, or fewer than 10 persons none of whom is an associate of the issuer. Applicable to green, social responsibility, and sustainability bonds and loans only: • pre-issuance external review related to the issuance demonstrating alignment with internationally-recognised principles, standards or guidance, as provided by a recognised external reviewer. Applicable to transition bonds and loans: • a developed and appropriately disclosed transition plan (or equivalent disclosures on climate transition strategy) at the entity-level . • pre-issuance external review demonstrating the adoption of internationally-recognised transition finance principles, standards or guidance (including the transition plan related elements under such principles, standards or guidance), as provided by a recognised external reviewer; and • for use-of-proceeds instruments, pre-issuance external review demonstrating alignment with an applicable internationally-recognised taxonomy, as provided by a recognised external reviewer. 4. Grant Amounts General Bond Issuance Costs Grant: 50% of eligible expenses (ie. fees to Hong Kong-based arrangers, Hong Kong-based legal advisors, Hong Kong-based auditors and accountants, Hong Kong-based rating agencies, HKEX listing fees and CMU lodging and clearing fees) up to the following caps: • HK$2.5 million where the bond, its issuer or its guarantor(s) possess a credit rating ; or • HK$1.25 million where no credit rating is available. External Review Costs Grant: Transaction-related fees paid to recognised external reviewers for up to a total cap of HK$800,000, further divided into specific caps as follows: • Pre-issuance external review (such as fees paid for certification, second-party opinion, verification, ESG scoring/rating, assurance): up to HK$250,000; and • Post-issuance external review: HK$200,000 per year for the first three years from the date of the eligible issuance or up until the maturity of the issuance, whichever is shorter.

14 May 2024