Insight,

SFC circular to asset managers on dubious arrangements or transactions

HK | EN
Current site :    HK   |   EN
Australia
China
China Hong Kong SAR
Japan
Singapore
United States
Global

On 21 November 2019, the Securities and Futures Commission (the "SFC") issued a circular on dubious private fund and discretionary account arrangements or transactions.

The circular provides guidance to asset managers ("AM") in considering if a proposed private fund and discretionary account arrangement or transaction is dubious; and deciding if they should proceed with such arrangement or transaction before accepting a new mandate, executing a new investment suggested by an investor or accepting the injection of new investment by the investor into a fund or discretionary accounts[1].

The circular follows a number of similarly themed circulars recently issued by the SFC and represents another step in the SFC's ongoing efforts to tackle potentially problematic transactions and investment arrangements, including concentrated, illiquid and interconnected investments with irregular features, margin financing disguised as investments, nominee and warehousing arrangements, and complex arrangements to finance risky investments and deficient lending practices[2].

Expected standards of conduct

Senior management of AM, who bears the primary responsibility for ensuring compliance, is expected to put in place effective procedures and controls in writing for AM to identify dubious arrangements or transactions and decide if they should proceed with them. These procedures and controls should cover the matters set out in the table below. AM are also expected to familiarise themselves with the non-exhaustive examples of red-flags set out in Appendix 2 of the circular and be vigilant where a proposed arrangement bears features same as or similar to those red-flags.

1. Initial screening

  • AM should perform initial screening to determine whether a proposed arrangement or transaction is dubious.
Assessment

AM are expected to:

  1. assess whether the proposed arrangement or transaction deviates from generally accepted market practice before accepting a new mandate, executing an investor directed or suggested transaction, or accepting the injection of an investment by the investor into a private fund or discretionary account; and
  2. if there is any reason to suspect that AM are not, or will not be, required or expected to make any investment decisions (apart from mere execution or operational decisions), review the details of the proposed arrangement or transaction and conduct further assessment, e.g. assess whether the structure looks unduly complex, whether the proposed transaction makes commercial sense, and whether the proposed transaction involves the investment of significant amounts by one or a few investors.
Reporting

If AM are not reasonably satisfied with the assessment outcome, the proposed arrangement or transaction should be considered dubious. The responsible staff should escalate the proposed arrangement or transaction and the initial screening result to the MIC of the Key Business Line (i.e. asset management) and compliance staff for a decision about whether to proceed.

2. Detailed due diligence

  • All proposed arrangements or transactions which are considered dubious at the initial screening should be logged and subject to detailed due diligence (DD) on investors and investors' instructions.
Detailed DD on investors

AM should assess:

  1. the relationship (if any) between the investor and other parties relevant to the same fund, discretionary account or the proposed investment, e.g. other investors in the same fund or discretionary account, the proposed investment, or the person from which the investment was directly acquired; and
  2. the investor's source of funding, e.g. whether the amount injected is commensurate with the investor's background and assets, and whether there are indications that the fund is from other parties.
Detailed DD on investors' instructions

AM should:

Set up and structures of funds or discretionary accounts

  1. understand the purpose of setting up the fund or the discretionary account;
  2. understand the rationale behind multiple or complex layers of arrangements or transactions; and
  3. assess whether the fund or discretionary account might have been set up for improper purposes.

Transactions directed by investors

  1. take a cautious approach if instructed by an investor to make a certain investment or use structured products or derivatives;
  2. make enquiries to determine whether the investor has set up similar arrangements with or made similar investments through other asset managers or brokers and whether such investments (if any) appear suspicious;
  3. assess whether the source of investments may involve any untoward arrangement or transaction; and
  4. assess whether the investment is relatively illiquid or involves investing in private companies or making sizable unsecured loans to persons with obscure backgrounds or poor financial standing, or whether the investor has suggested a convoluted, risky or expensive way of making the investment.

3. Senior management review and decision

  • Senior management of AM should exercise due skill, care and diligence in reviewing each proposed arrangement or transaction which was determined to be dubious and take additional steps such as seeking professional advice if necessary. It should only proceed if all of its concerns have been sufficiently addressed.

4. Documentation

  • AM should maintain full documentation covering all aspects of any proposed private fund or discretionary account arrangement or transaction which has been determined to be dubious at the initial screening.
Scope

Documentation should include:

  1. a log of all such arrangements and transactions;
  2. details of the initial screening and detailed due diligence as well as any additional steps taken by the senior management, with the corresponding results; and
  3. the senior management's review and decision, with its stated reasons for approval.

Consequences of failing to meet the expected standards of conduct

  1. Misconduct by AM's clients
  • In disregarding signs of dubious private fund and discretionary account arrangements or transactions, AM may have facilitated the following types of misconduct by clients or relevant entities:
    1. avoiding or contravening any of the market misconduct provisions or disclosure obligations or other laws, rules and regulations, such as the Codes on Takeovers and Mergers and Share Buy-backs and the Listing Rules;
    2. conducting unlicensed regulated activities; or
    3. involvement in fraud or other serious misconduct or illicit activities.
  1. Regulatory action against AM and their senior management
    1. If AM fail to detect or report dubious arrangements or transactions or they facilitate illegal or improper conduct due to inadequacies in their procedures and controls, there is a risk that AM may be construed to be in breach of certain regulatory requirements including the Code of Conduct for Persons Licensed by or Registered with the Securities and Futures Commission, or the Guideline on Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Financing of Terrorism (For Licensed Corporations).
    2. These breaches and failures to meet the expected standards of conduct will also call into question whether the AM remain fit and proper to be licensed.
  1. Next steps
  • AM must at all times remain vigilant in their asset management activities and particularly when dealing with potentially dubious or complex arrangements or transactions. If you have any queries in relation to any of your existing or potential new asset management activities, please do not hesitate to contact us.


[1] Please note that the circular does not apply to licensed corporations and registered institutions which provide discretionary account services as an ancillary part of their brokerage services for clients, without any formal investment mandates agreed with or management fees charged to clients.


[2] See previous SFC circulars:

LATEST THINKING
Insight
Investors in private equity funds who are negotiating fund terms with fund managers can improve the transparency of the private equity industry and the commercial terms on which they invest by actively advocating for stringent terms and changes in market standards to protect their own interests. Pro-active efforts by investors during negotiations are essential to maintain high standards of investor protection.

11 March 2025

Insight
The Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong (“SFC”) issued a circular on 17 February 2025, clarifying the requirements for closed-ended funds seeking a listing on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (“SEHK”). This marks the latest initiative by the Hong Kong government to broaden distribution channels for private equity funds, following the launch of the New Capital Investment Entrant Scheme (as discussed in our previous article) and the expansion of the tax concession regime for funds and single-family offices.

21 February 2025

Insight
Hong Kong has a rigorous licensing and compliance framework for virtual asset exchanges, as we summarised in our KWM 2023 Guide to VATP Licensing. The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has recently published fresh guidance on Hong Kong’s virtual asset trading platform (VATP) regime, in three key documents. These are as follows: Announcement: SFC’s extension of the swift licensing process to new VATP applicants (Swift Licensing Process). Circular: Circular to new VATP operators seeking to be licensed: enhanced licensing process and revamped external assessments (Updated Licensing and Assessments Circular). Circular: Circular on findings from inspections on deemed-to-be-licensed VATP applicants and expected standards of conduct for VATP operators (Expectations and Observations Circular). This article sets out a summary of these important materials. Please contact us if you have any questions about the VATP regime. We have supported several applicants and would be delighted to assist you.

14 February 2025