03 July 2020

60-second CFIUS: Bipartisan Senate bill would fund US semiconductor industry

A bipartisan group of senators has introduced another bill to aid the US semiconductor industry. The move signals continuing support across party lines for this important part of the US high technology sector.

The “American Foundries Act” is backed by members not usually found in the same political zip code—including Tom Cotton (R-Ark) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY), as well as Kirsten Gillebrand (D-NY) and Marco Rubio (R-Fla). The legislation would provide $15 billion in incentives for new domestic semiconductor manufacturing, and another $5 billion for public-private partnerships to update US foundries. The “Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors for America Act” introduced by Senators Mark Warner (D-VA) and John Cornyn (R-TX) earlier this month would also provide about $20 billion in funding.

This bipartisan effort is welcome in the US, but China’s spending has for years outstripped the funding levels in the proposed legislation. The second national semiconductor fund in the PRC was capitalized with almost $30 billion, and is only one part of Beijing’s national business plan to establish a competitive semiconductor industry. The Obama Administration noted the significance of China’s drive to modernize its semiconductor industry in a 2017 report, but the US still lags in putting its money behind its policy.

As we pointed out in an earlier post, CFIUS has blocked a number of Chinese investments in the US semiconductor industry, although some deals are still getting through. Meanwhile, US semiconductor companies are increasingly turning to joint ventures and expansion in China itself, because regardless of the political cross-currents, China remains the world’s largest market for semiconductors.

Whether current trade tensions would continue under a different administration remains a subject of intense speculation in both countries. Some analysts believe Joe Biden’s historical preference for multilateralism indicates he might be less likely to support aggressive use of tariffs, sanctions and export controls in dealing with China. Regardless, however, bilateral competition is likely to remain a bipartisan concern for the foreseeable future.

A Guide to Doing Business in China

We explore the key issues being considered by clients looking to unlock investment opportunities in the People’s Republic of China.

Doing Business in China
Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
    You might also be interested in

    Trump issued an executive order addressing security issue to block mobile application WeChat owned by Tencent Holdings Ltd.

    24 September 2020

    Executive Summary The US International Trade Commission (“ITC”) recently suspended enforcement of its remedial orders in a patent investigation pending the appeal of a decision by the U.S...

    14 September 2020

    We sum up the definitions of accredited investor and qualified institutional buyer as proposed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

    10 September 2020

    The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) within the US Department of Commerce has announced in an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that it is seeking public comments on how it should define and...

    01 September 2020

    This site uses cookies to enhance your experience and to help us improve the site. Please see our Privacy Policy for further information. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive these cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

    For more information on which cookies we use then please refer to our Cookie Policy.