18 November 2016

Summary of SuperInvestor 2016 Main Conference Day Two

This conference summary was written by Brendan Gallen (managing associate).


If you like this, you might be interested in:

Summary of SuperInvestor 2016 Main Conference Day 1

Summary of SuperInvestor 2016 Final Main Conference Day

Latest from Private Equity Comment: What does Trump's election mean for private equity and venture capital industry?

Day two of the SuperInvestor Conference in Amsterdam and the private equity mid-market came under close scrutiny in the morning sessions. At a time when mid-market purchase multiples are at an 18-month high, coupled with large amounts of dry-powder and the availability of debt, the panel considered and shared their insights into the current macroeconomic conditions and what may lie ahead for the sector. With market prices at such levels and interest rates remaining at historical lows, key market indicators point towards a sellers’ market.

Manjit Dale, Founding Partner of TDR Capital, shared with us where he sees acquisition and growth opportunities lying ahead given the current macroeconomic market conditions. Despite operating in a high price environment, many still see a healthy pipeline of deals coming through on their books, particularly where a strong business plan – seeking a global strategy coupled with growth opportunities where possible – can help a team take a portfolio company to its next level. With EBITDA and leverage multiples as high as they presently are on asset sales, the focus needs to shift away from further expansions of these multiples as a reversion to the mean is to be expected. And of course, if exit multiples were to contract and revert to their mean (as they are anticipated to do so) at a faster rate than a portfolio manager can implement a successful global and growth strategy for example, then this will pose significant problems for fund managers.

In such a high price environment that the mid-market is currently experiencing, it’s easier to see where the opportunity lies for those companies that are not already top quartile. A third quartile company still has a natural opportunity to target becoming top quartile. Where then for an already top quartile company? ‘Internationalisation’ was flagged by the panel as the natural route for such a company given current market conditions.

Fees, carry, expenses and other fund terms were all on the agenda in the afternoon sessions. Particular consideration was given to limited partners’ sentiment towards what are perceived as the industry’s aggressive economic terms in the current climate. For large private equity firms with multi-strategy platforms, is it still justifiable to be anchored to the historically accepted ‘two and twenty’ model that the private equity industry has become so accustomed to, particularly where synergies across platforms exist and where funds that do operate numerous platforms simultaneously are able to collect many management fees at the same time? Kelly De Ponte, Managing Director at Probitas Partners doesn’t think so, and indicated that in some cases, as part of the overall allocation considerations, limited partners are being turned off and not prepared to consider those fund managers with larger management fees, particularly where they’re being collected as part of a multi strategy platform with numerous funds in operation at the same time.

One of the late afternoon sessions considered fund expenses and the sentiment of limited partners to these. Of course, given the continued pressure being applied in the United States by the SEC under the Dodd-Frank Act, it’s not only limited partners that fund managers need to contend with. Expenses continue to come under close scrutiny not only by the regulators but also by investors. A mater that often used to be addressed in a limited partnership agreement in a short paragraph can now expect to run to many pages in length. Disclosure is key for fund managers but is not, in and of itself, sufficient to avoid SEC investigation. Fund managers must not only seek to manage investor expectations through full disclosure, they must not forget their fiduciary duties to their investors either.

Related articles:

Summary of SuperInvestor 2016 Main Conference Day 1

Summary of SuperInvestor 2016 Final Main Conference Day

Latest from Private Equity Comment: What does Trump's election mean for private equity and venture capital industry?

A Guide to Doing Business in China

We explore the key issues being considered by clients looking to unlock investment opportunities in the People’s Republic of China.

Doing Business in China
Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+
    You might also be interested in

    A recent government paper has tentatively proposed that a voluntary “governance code” should be drawn up and applied to certain privately-held, economically significant companies and LLPs.

    16 December 2016

    We examine changes to the requirements regarding client communications (including marketing) under MiFID II.

    14 December 2016

    Invest Europe has released a standardised ESG DDQ for fund managers and their portfolio companies

    09 December 2016

    A consultation will begin in 2017 on extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to all FCA/PRA authorised firms, which includes private equity and venture capital firms

    02 December 2016

    You may also be interested in...

    This site uses cookies to enhance your experience and to help us improve the site. Please see our Privacy Policy for further information. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive these cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

    For more information on which cookies we use then please refer to our Cookie Policy.