18 April 2016

Ye v Zheng - The Australian Court’s approach to the relationship between the Seat and Enforcement Courts

Ye v Zeng [2015] FCA 1192 and Ye v Zeng (No 2) [2015] FCA 1243 are two recent judgments involving an application before the Australian Federal Court for the recognition and enforcement of a foreign award in an international commercial arbitration.

Issue

The decision involved an application for recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award made in China by the Xiamen Arbitration Commission. The respondent sought to stay enforcement of the award by arguing, inter alia, a lack of procedural fairness and that the matter was subject to an appeal at the seat (the PRC).  

Held

The presiding judge noted the court’s discretion to order security and that the matter should be approached by assessing the legitimacy of the appeal. In the earlier judgment, the court had given the respondents an opportunity to substantiate the nature of the procedural fairness complaint, noting that a complaint of  procedural fairness and natural justice would be picked up by Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention, to which China is a party. No evidence was filed and, accordingly, the judge found no clear basis for such a challenge. As a result, the judge ordered the full principle sum, together with some interest, to be secured in Australia to secure the award pending the outcome of the appeal, commenting that:

In an era of electronic commerce and fast moving funds, it is unsatisfactory to expect the courts to stand by and simply wait weeks or months for another country’s courts to go about their work and protect a party that has, until set aside, a binding award entered into and awarded pursuant to the contractual undertakings of the parties.

Not only does this judgment illustrate the way in which Australian courts will enforce Chinese arbitration awards pursuant to the New York Convention, the judge’s further comments also indicate that the mere fact of an appeal at the seat of arbitration is insufficient grounds to stay enforcement or to set aside the award. The fact that an award is set aside in the seat country does not mean that the award will not be enforced elsewhere.[1]


View more articles from the latest edition of Crossing Borders.


[1] Citing, Dallah Real Estate v The Ministry of Religious Affiars, Government of Pakistan [2010] UKSC 46

Download Crossing Borders: International Arbitration Insights - Where will we be in 2028?

Crossing Borders is a periodic review of developments in international arbitration across the world. Included in this special 10th edition, we explore what arbitrations will be like going into 2028 - where, how and by whom disputes will be decided.

Belt and Road Initiative

Insights and publications for public and private sector players looking to explore the opportunities presented by the Belt and Road Initiative.

Belt and Road

A Guide to Doing Business in China

We explore the key issues being considered by clients looking to unlock investment opportunities in the People’s Republic of China.

Doing Business in China

Download Crossing Borders: International Arbitration Insights - Where will we be in 2028?

Crossing Borders is a periodic review of developments in international arbitration across the world. Included in this special 10th edition, we explore what arbitrations will be like going into 2028 - where, how and by whom disputes will be decided.

Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+
    You might also be interested in

    China and Russia share over 4000 km of border and now they share an arbitral institution as the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (“HKIAC”) becomes the first international arbitration...

    17 April 2019

    The recent release of the 2017-2018 Annual Asia-Pacific Report on Investor-State Dispute Settlement and Transparency serves as a reminder of how transparency has become an accepted feature of...

    12 April 2018

    The growth in cross-border commercial and investment activity in the Asia Pacific, particularly with the rising economy of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), has resulted in a corresponding growth...

    12 April 2018

    The Japanese government recently announced that it is proposing to establish a new dedicated dispute resolution centre in Tokyo.

    12 April 2018

    You may also be interested in...

    Legal services for your business

    This site uses cookies to enhance your experience and to help us improve the site. Please see our Privacy Policy for further information. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive these cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

    For more information on which cookies we use then please refer to our Cookie Policy.