17 September 2015

Mobile workers in Europe and the working time directive: business faces higher costs

This article was written by Tamsin Rickard.

We updated you in July about a potential ruling from the European Court of Justice (the “ECJ”) that travelling time to and from work might count as working time for some peripatetic workers.

The ECJ has now confirmed that position.

The decision has provoked widespread press coverage including headlines implying that travelling to work “is work”, but the court's ruling was fairly limited: it related only to workers with no fixed workplace to report to at the start and end of each working day. In this case, the workers' itinerary was dictated to them by their employer on a daily basis so they were effectively at their employer's disposal as soon as they left home. Unlike an employee with a fixed base, who could move closer to work or use a different mode of transport, there was little these workers could do to minimise travel time. As a result the ECJ found that their working time included the journeys to the first appointment of the day, and home again at the end, taking into account the health and safety aims of the Working Time Directive.

Employers of mobile or peripatetic workers, such as delivery, care or maintenance staff who do not attend a base location but travel as part of their work to a number of different locations as their employer dictates, should address the impact of this ruling now. This may include the following additional obligations:

  • additional rest breaks for the mobile workers to reflect their longer “working day”, potentially entailing the need for more staff to pick up any slack;
  • increased pay obligations, depending on the terms of the workers’ contracts;
  • some employers may be concerned that this ruling is open to abuse, with workers taking detours on the way home to conduct personal business thereby extending their apparent "working time”; it may be advisable to put in place procedures dealing with this.

The precise impact will vary across EU countries, depending on how they have implemented the Working Time Directive. This may not be the end of the story – this ruling may open the door to further attempts to redefine the scope of working time where staff have a peripatetic element to their duties.

Data Central

Have you checked out our new Data Hub? Data Central contains a range of resources to help our clients minimise the legal, regulatory and commercial risks this data-driven environment presents and ensure that its full value is being realised.

A Guide to Investing in Australian Real Estate

Investing Down Under offers a quick overview of the legal, taxation, FIRB and structuring issues you may encounter when investing in Australian real estate.

A Guide to Doing Business in China

We explore the key issues being considered by clients looking to unlock investment opportunities in the People’s Republic of China.

Doing Business in China
Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+
    You might also be interested in

    China has introduced a more open visa policy for overseas talent.

    15 January 2018

    Organized into 19 stand-alone law topics, this article presents perspectives and on-the-ground experience from an experienced legal counsel in China.

    15 November 2017

    PRA and FCA consult on whistleblowing rules for UK branches of overseas banks

    10 October 2016

    King & Wood Mallesons explores the implications of the vote to leave the European Union

    24 June 2016

    Legal services for your business

    This site uses cookies to enhance your experience and to help us improve the site. Please see our Privacy Policy for further information. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive these cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

    For more information on which cookies we use then please refer to our Cookie Policy.