14 March 2016

Brexit In Brief: Environment


Transcript

Environmental policy has hardly been mentioned in the public debate on EU Membership so far, which is quite surprising as about 90 per cent of the UK’s environmental legislation comes from EU legislation. The EU has had a huge impact on the development of environmental policy and law in the UK over the past 40 years and has undoubtedly had a positive effect in making us clean up our act in areas like air pollution, water pollution and waste management, although some EU environmental laws have been criticised as burdensome red tape by some business sectors.

It is very difficult to predict what environmental law and policy in the UK might look like following any EU exit, but here are two possibilities. Firstly, within the UK itself, environmental policy is devolved to the devolved administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and we are already starting to see policies diverging between the different parts of the UK, with Scotland and Wales generally setting more ambitious environmental goals than England and Northern Ireland. Currently, that happens within the framework provided by EU environmental law, but without that framework, it is possible that policies in different parts of the UK could diverge even further which could make compliance more difficult for businesses operating in more than one part of the UK.

A second possibility however is that leaving the EU would actually have little impact on environmental law and policy in the UK and there are two reasons for that. The first reason is that if UK businesses wanted to trade with the EU, any goods exported to the EU would still have to comply with EU environmental standards. And if the UK joined the EEA or EFTA, we would still have to sign up to most of the EU’s environmental laws, because those laws also affect the functioning of the single market.

The second reason is that a lot of EU environmental legislation implements international treaty commitments which the UK has signed up to in its own right on matters ranging from climate change to cross border movements of waste. So even if we weren’t in the EU, we would still have to honour those international commitments.

A Guide to Doing Business in China

We explore the key issues being considered by clients looking to unlock investment opportunities in the People’s Republic of China.

Doing Business in China

Brexit - Perspectives from KWM

We spent months interviewing clients and business leaders across Europe about the possible impact of Brexit. Keep up to date with new developments as and when we have them.

Brexit - Perspective from KWM
Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
    You might also be interested in

    In this article, we will break down the main points raised in the Administrative Instruction with the reference to Guidelines for Anti-monopoly in the Field of Platform Economy so that enterprises...

    13 April 2021

    2020年10月12日,经济合作与发展组织(“OECD”)分别发布了关于“支柱一”和“支柱二”方案的蓝图报告(“支柱一蓝图报告”和“支柱二蓝图报告”,合称为“支柱蓝图报告”),向公众征询意见。通过该做法,OECD推后了其此前关于OECD成员国能在今年年底前达成全球技术性和政治性共识的期望。考虑到世界正聚焦于COVID-19及美国总统选举,这并不令人感到惊讶。

    09 December 2020

    Over the last decade or so there has been dramatic growth in PRC real estate developments in the larger cities, and much of that has been financed by debt.

    20 October 2020

    2020年6月,美国决定“暂停”加入经济合作与发展组织(“OECD”)的支柱一和支柱二方案,该方案为OECD税基侵蚀与利润转移(BEPS)项目的“第二阶段”。尽管如此,OECD仍然强调,美国既未退出谈判,也没有停止磋商。这一事件及时提醒我们,对于实施OECD的支柱一和支柱二方案,还存在着一系列障碍。本文对相关方案进行了概述,并就在国家间无法达成共识的情况下推进这些方案的替代性方法展开了思考。

    07 October 2020

    This site uses cookies to enhance your experience and to help us improve the site. Please see our Privacy Policy for further information. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive these cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

    For more information on which cookies we use then please refer to our Cookie Policy.