04 December 2015

Paris Court of Appeal dismisses a damages claim against Google based on alleged predatory pricing

Further to proceedings brought by a French mapping provider, Bottin Cartographes, now known as Evermaps, the Paris Commercial Court (the Commercial Court) stated on 31 January 2012 that by not charging a fee for its mapping products Google Inc. (Google) was pricing the products below cost and thus abusing its dominant position in the market of online mapping tools. It ordered Google to pay €500,000 damages to Bottin Cartographes.

Google appealed this decision before the Paris Court of Appeal (the Court of Appeal) which, in compliance with the French Commercial Code, sought advice from the French Competition Authority (the FCA) regarding the potential existence of a predatory pricing practice from Google in the relevant market.

Following the FCA’s opinion, the Court of Appeal ruled that Google’s pricing policy could not be considered as predatory. It was held that, although some of Google’s mapping products were free, income from sources such as advertising should be taken into account. This approach meant that all except two of the costs tests carried out demonstrated that the income generated from Google’s online mapping tools fully covered costs, including those generated by the free version.

The two tests showing that Google's prices were potentially questionable did establish that incomes generated by its online mapping tools were below long-run average incremental costs but above average avoidable costs. However, the Court of Appeal found that Google did not have the intention of forcing competitors out of the relevant market and that, in any case, did not have the ability to do so given the strong competition on the market.

The Court of Appeal therefore overruled the Commercial Court's judgment.

Data Central

Have you checked out our new Data Hub? Data Central contains a range of resources to help our clients minimise the legal, regulatory and commercial risks this data-driven environment presents and ensure that its full value is being realised.

A Guide to Doing Business in China

We explore the key issues being considered by clients looking to unlock investment opportunities in the People’s Republic of China.

Doing Business in China
Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
    You might also be interested in

    We discusses recent developments and emerging trends in competition litigation involving the Competition Appeal Tribunal.

    28 November 2016

    The European Commission’s proposed Geo-Blocking Regulation fails to address some of the key e-commerce concerns the Commission had previously identified.

    21 June 2016

    This article was written by Andrew Morrison (associate) Ultra Finishings On 10 May 2016 the UK Competition and Markets Authority (the CMA) fined Ultra Finishing Limited (Ultra) £786,668 for...

    21 June 2016

    European Commission refrains from imposing regulations specifically targeting online platforms, for now. General EU e-commerce rules will however apply.

    20 June 2016

    This site uses cookies to enhance your experience and to help us improve the site. Please see our Privacy Policy for further information. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive these cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

    For more information on which cookies we use then please refer to our Cookie Policy.