18 September 2015

Director sentenced to 6 months imprisonment for engaging in prohibited cartel activity

On 14 September 2015, the director of Franklin Hodge Industries, Nigel Snee, was given a 6 month suspended prison sentence and 120 hours of community service for “dishonestly agreeing with others to fix prices, divide up customers and rig bids” relating to the supply of galvanised steel water storage tanks in the UK.

Following an investigation, Nigel Snee, Nicholas Stringer and Clive Dean, all from different companies, were each charged with the criminal cartel offence set out in section 188 of the Enterprise Act 2001. Snee had pleaded guilty to the offence and had been cooperating with the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) investigation for over a year. Nicholas Stringer and Clive Dean were tried earlier this summer and acquitted, when a jury decided that the conduct of the defendants had not been 'dishonest'.

Snee appeared for sentencing this week. The sentencing judge first sought to emphasise the seriousness of cartel conduct, saying that prison sentences ought to be ‘expected’ as a result of such conduct. Snee’s early guilty plea and continued cooperation enabled the judge to apply a 75% reduction from a starting position of 2 years imprisonment, and to suspend the 6 month sentence for 12 months.

The CMA also continues with its separate civil investigation, looking into potential breaches of the Competition Act 1998, and it should be noted that the results of previous civil investigations have been substantial penalties for the businesses involved, irrespective of the outcome of the criminal case.

Dishonesty, which was so important in the trial of Stringer and Dean, is no longer a requirement of the criminal cartel offence. The CMA sought to highlight that defendants charged under the new offence will not have the opportunity to hide behind a lack of dishonesty.

The effect on convictions following the change in the law is yet to be seen, however it is clear that the reform sought to facilitate the successful prosecution of individuals who may have engaged in prohibited cartel activity, by removing the ‘dishonesty’ requirement of the criminal cartel offence. It should also be remembered that even if the CMA decides not to commence a criminal prosecution, they could seek a Director Disqualification Order against individuals whose companies are found to have committed competition law infringements.

A Guide to Doing Business in China

We explore the key issues being considered by clients looking to unlock investment opportunities in the People’s Republic of China.

Doing Business in China
Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
    You might also be interested in

    We discusses recent developments and emerging trends in competition litigation involving the Competition Appeal Tribunal.

    28 November 2016

    The European Commission’s proposed Geo-Blocking Regulation fails to address some of the key e-commerce concerns the Commission had previously identified.

    21 June 2016

    This article was written by Andrew Morrison (associate) Ultra Finishings On 10 May 2016 the UK Competition and Markets Authority (the CMA) fined Ultra Finishing Limited (Ultra) £786,668 for...

    21 June 2016

    European Commission refrains from imposing regulations specifically targeting online platforms, for now. General EU e-commerce rules will however apply.

    20 June 2016

    This site uses cookies to enhance your experience and to help us improve the site. Please see our Privacy Policy for further information. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive these cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

    For more information on which cookies we use then please refer to our Cookie Policy.