10 November 2015

A tightening noose on interest-expense

In 2013, the G20 Governments and the OECD launched a project looking at “base erosion and profit shifting” (”BEPS”) or, in other words, how multinationals "are exploiting the rules to pay little or no tax in many of the markets in which they operate". An Action Plan containing fifteen separate actions was drawn up by the OECD with the aim of blocking aggressive tax planning by multinationals. Action 4 of the plan focused on the use/manipulation of interest expense to reduce taxable earnings and to drive BEPS.. Three areas involving interest-expense were identified as being particularly problematic:

  • Groups placing higher levels of third party debt in higher-tax jurisdictions (debt is then on-lent by way of intra group loan to an entity in a lower-tax environment, leaving interest on the commercial loan to be set against tax in the higher-tax jurisdiction)
  • Groups using intra-group loans to generate interest deductions greatly in excess of actual third party interest expense
  • Groups using third party or intra group debt to fund the generation of tax-exempt income.

The OECD’s proposal is to tackle the problem by limiting tax deductions for interest (and payments similar to interest) to a fixed percentage of a business’s EBITDA (the ‘’fixed ratio rule’’). The relevant percentage will be in the range of 10-30%. A ‘’group ratio rule’’ will allow a business to deduct net interest expense up to a group-wide limit, where that’s higher than the relevant fixed ratio. To soften the blow, the OECD contemplates exceptions for public-benefit projects and an overall de minimis monetary threshold to carve out businesses with a low level of net interest expense. Carry-forward of disallowed interest expense for use in future years could also be available.

The UK Government is currently looking at its rules on interest-deduction in light of the OECD's Action Plan.  HM Treasury has issued a consultation paper on the topic (responses to be submitted by 14 January 2016). That paper mentions that although the OECD focused on multinationals, any new rules will bind domestic UK businesses too. It also points out, as regards BEPS legislation, that the ‘’government recognises that this would be a major change to the UK corporate tax regime and will require careful consideration’’ and notes that any new rules are unlikely to come into effect before 1 April 2017.

A Guide to Doing Business in China

We explore the key issues being considered by clients looking to unlock investment opportunities in the People’s Republic of China.

Doing Business in China
Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
    You might also be interested in

    The EIF has become invaluable for many venture and smaller buyout funds; a number of which may not have been raised without the EIF's cornerstone investment and subsequent support

    11 November 2016

    Under AIFMD, marketing a private equity or venture capital fund in the EU has either got somewhat easier, or considerably harder – depending on access to a marketing passport.

    04 November 2016

    The AIFMD’s “third country passport” may be available in some non-EU countries relatively soon, but questions remain on how to opt in and what happens to National Private Placement Rules.

    30 September 2016

    To mark the milestone of the 700th edition of Private Equity Comment we welcome Michael Collins, Invest Europe’s Public Affairs Director as guest author.

    09 September 2016

    You may also be interested in...

    This site uses cookies to enhance your experience and to help us improve the site. Please see our Privacy Policy for further information. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive these cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

    For more information on which cookies we use then please refer to our Cookie Policy.