07 October 2016

Regulation of financial benchmarks: new recommendations

This article was written by Anne-Marie Neagle and Holly Fairhurst.

On Tuesday 4 October 2016, the Treasurer released the Council of Financial Regulators’ (CFR) advice to the Government proposing strengthened regulation of financial benchmarks.

What has happened?

The Treasurer has released advice received from the CFR, which includes a number of specific recommendations for the regulation of financial benchmarks and was jointly developed by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Commonwealth Treasury.

The advice was provided at the request of the Treasurer and followed CFR stakeholder consultation on reform options.

The Treasurer has stated that this “package will ensure our regulatory regime is as modern and secure as any comparable regime found in equivalent foreign jurisdictions, such as the United Kingdom and the European Union.”

What are the recommendations?

Key aspects of the CFR recommendations include that:

  • (new ASIC licensing regime) administrators of “significant benchmarks” should be required to hold a new, standalone “benchmark administration licence”, unless exempted.

    The CFR has recommended that “significant benchmarks” should be identified by reference to specified criteria, which in broad terms are intended to identify systemically important benchmarks and benchmarks that will have a significant impact on investors. However, for certainty, the CFR has also recommended that the implementing legislation or regulations should include an initial list of significant benchmarks, and that ASIC should be empowered to prescribe additional (or remove) significant benchmarks from time to time.

    Based on the criteria recommended, the CFR anticipates that the Bank Bill Swap Rate (BBSW), the Standard & Poor’s (S&P)/Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) 200 index, the ASX Bond futures settlement price, the cash rate and the Consumer Price Index (CPI) are likely to be considered significant, and has noted that the WM/Reuters Australian dollar foreign exchange benchmark could also be considered significant;

  • (new ASIC rule-making power – regulated benchmarks) ASIC should be empowered to make rules imposing obligations on licensed benchmark administrators, which should align with relevant International Organisation of Securities’ Commission’s (IOSCO) principles but may also expand those obligations in some cases;

  • (new ASIC rule-making power – submitters) although benchmark administrators should retain primary responsibility for operating a benchmark, ASIC should be empowered to make rules on regulatory matters related to benchmark submission (such as record keeping, governance of the submission process and data quality). The CFR has also recommended that the regime should enable the rules to apply to a range of entities that may make a submission to a significant benchmark;

  • (power to compel submission) ASIC should be empowered to make rules that could compel submission to a significant benchmark as a last resort; and

  • (new specific criminal and civil offences) new specific criminal and civil offences of benchmark manipulation applicable to all financial benchmarks (not just significant benchmarks) should be introduced.

The recommendations propose that the new regulations should apply to significant benchmarks regardless of the domicile of the administrator, and that the new offences should extend to conduct having a relevant impact in Australia, even if that conduct occurs outside Australia.

Questions?

If you would like to discuss how these developments may affect your organisation, please contact one of our key contacts.

Key contacts

Regulator

Australia's financial institutions are experiencing more regulatory pressure than ever before. Remain at the forefront of key regulatory issues as we guide and shape the future of financial services.

regulator
Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
    You might also be interested in

    Foreign financial services providers (FFSPs) now have certainty about their Australian financial services (AFS) licensing position.

    12 March 2020

    With Australian banking customers soon able to take control of sharing their banking data using the Consumer Data Right (CDR), the Australian Government is looking to the CDR’s future and how it can...

    09 March 2020

    With the volatility in world markets impacting on finance transactions, we look at certain key aspects of existing and future finance transactions under English and Australian law which we are...

    06 March 2020

    The goal posts for executing a deal in the financial services sector have changed. In this difficult regulatory environment, sellers are finding it harder to get their deals away.

    27 February 2020

    This site uses cookies to enhance your experience and to help us improve the site. Please see our Privacy Policy for further information. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive these cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

    For more information on which cookies we use then please refer to our Cookie Policy.