26 August 2016

An attractive jurisdiction for cartel damages claims - Class actions in Germany

While Germany does not have a general class action regime, collective redress is available for claimants by other means and Germany continues to be considered an attractive place for claimants to bring cartel damages actions in particular. In addition to the general procedural right to join parties (on both the claimant and defendant side), additional mechanisms for cartel damages claims include:

  • a right on the part of certain registered trade associations and consumer protection organisations to file group actions where a breach of competition law affects their members; and
  • the use of special purpose entities which aggregate and take assignment of cartel damage claims and then litigate them to recover damages. While this practice of collective enforcement of claims has been subject to some criticism, the standing of such claims vehicles has been confirmed, subject to having sufficient funding to pay the defendant’s costs if the claim fails as otherwise the vehicle’s mechanism for assigning and collecting claims could be regarded as illegal.

The position of claimants will be strengthened by amendments that implement the EU Directive on Antitrust Damages into German law by the end of 2016. Among other changes, the new rules:

  • enable claimants to benefit from the binding effect of decisions of competition authorities across the EU (along with final appeal decisions),
  • introduce a rebuttable presumption to the benefit of the claimants that any cartel infringement leads to higher prices for direct purchasers, and provide explicit standing for indirect purchasers if they can establish they have suffered damage, with a presumption that damages have been passed on to them (requiring a passing-on scenario on the part of the direct purchasers),
  • provide that cartelists are jointly and severally liable for damages (as in Australia),
  • limit cost risks for claimants as statutory refunds are available,
  • set a relatively high rate of interest, available from the date of the first occurrence of the damage,
  • introduce new rules on the disclosure of documents, which will dramatically improve the ability of claimants in German courts to access documents to substantiate their claim, given traditional restrictions on pre-trial discovery, and
  • extend the statutory limitation period to five years, and suspend the limitation period while competition authorities are investigating the infringements.

These changes are expected to further enhance Germany’s status as an attractive jurisdiction for the prosecution of cartel damages claims.

Want to know more?

The Review: Class Actions in Australia 2015/2016 examines key class action decisions from July 2014 to June 2015 as well as current proposals for reform. It provides an analysis of how these decisions are likely to affect future proceedings for both plaintiffs and defendants, and also looks at emerging trends in class action regimes around the world. 

This is the fifth annual report released by King & Wood Mallesons’ Class Actions & Regulatory Investigations Practice, which has worked on some of the largest and most complex class action matters in Australia.

Key contacts

Belt and Road Initiative

Insights and publications for public and private sector players looking to explore the opportunities presented by the Belt and Road Initiative.

Belt and Road
Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+
    You might also be interested in

    ASIC is set to crack down on the use of stub equity in public bids by private equity sponsors. Our experts Mark McNamara, Lee Horan, Mark Vanderneut and Cathy Chan discuss with the Australia...

    25 June 2019

    In Roo Roofing Pty Ltd & Anor v The Commonwealth of Australia [2019] VSC 331, the Supreme Court of Victoria has refused to find that the Federal Government had to take reasonable care in the design...

    14 June 2019

    The release of the exposure draft of laws for the Consumer Data Right is the next important step in starting Open Banking in Australia

    13 June 2019

    The High Court of Australia (HCA) , in its decision Rinehart v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd confirmed Australian courts’ approach to interpretation of commercial arbitration clauses and when a non...

    30 May 2019

    This site uses cookies to enhance your experience and to help us improve the site. Please see our Privacy Policy for further information. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive these cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

    For more information on which cookies we use then please refer to our Cookie Policy.

    Supported by Cheap Skip Bin Hire Melbourne - Hire Skip Bins Ltd