19 November 2018

10 things to bear in mind regarding arbitral confidentiality

By Brendan Palmer (Dubai)

One reason for electing for arbitration as a dispute mechanism is often the confidentiality of the proceedings. But what exactly does that mean?

Here are 10 things to bear in mind: 

  1. Privacy versus confidentiality: These are separate concepts. Privacy generally refers to the exclusion of third parties from hearings, whereas confidentiality is a wider obligation not to release details of the arbitration to non-parties. 
  2. What law determines the scope of the confidentiality: In jurisdictions where confidentiality takes effect as an implied term, its scope will be governed by the law of the arbitration agreement, whereas in jurisdictions where confidentiality arises from statute, the law of the seat is likely to apply.
  3. The extent: In many jurisdictions, including England, confidentiality includes both the hearing and documents generated. Depending on the seat, and any further agreement,confidentiality might also attach to the existence of an arbitration, the parties and awards. It is generally accepted that the deliberations of arbitrators are confidential.
  4.  The persons to whom it applies: Typically confidentiality extends to both the parties and the arbitrators. It may also extend to witnesses, but acting prudently, an express agreement should be sought.
  5. Source: In some jurisdictions confidentiality is statutorily provided for, in others it arises as an implied term of the arbitration agreement (as is the case in England). Some arbitral rulesets provide for confidentiality by default (LCIA, DIAC), others do not.
  6. Agreement: In the absence of any binding legislative confidentiality or confidentiality provisions in the chosen arbitral ruleset, parties should consider an explicit agreement with respect to confidentiality, either as part of their arbitration agreement or separately. Even where confidentiality is otherwise provided for, an express agreement gives the parties to opportunity to clarify and/or tailor the extent of confidentiality agreed to apply.
  7. Prohibited disclosure: Confidentiality obligations may prevent disclosure of an award by a subsidiary to a parent company.
  8. Exceptions: Depending on the law governing the confidentiality agreement, exceptions may include (as in England): where the parties have agreed otherwise or consented to disclosure; where disclosure is required by Court Order; where disclosure is necessary to protect a legal right; or where disclosure is in the interests of justice.
  9. The Award: Whilst an award is likely to be subject to confidentiality, exceptions are likely to apply, in particular where, for example, disclosure is required to the competent court for enforcement.
  10. Related Court Proceedings: Many states legislate to preserve the confidentiality of arbitral proceedings before the Courts, with a presumption that confidentiality should apply to arbitration claims, and that hearings should be held in private.

Key contacts

Download Crossing Borders: International Arbitration Insights - Where will we be in 2028?

Crossing Borders is a periodic review of developments in international arbitration across the world. Included in this special 10th edition, we explore what arbitrations will be like going into 2028 - where, how and by whom disputes will be decided.

KWM Belt & Road Center for International Cooperation and Facilitation

In March 2019, King & Wood Mallesons (KWM) established the Belt & Road Center for International Cooperation and Facilitation (BRCICF).

Belt and Road
Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+
    You might also be interested in

    The Supreme Court of Victoria has considered whether an insured buyer under a warranty and indemnity (W&I) policy is entitled to indemnity from an insurer in circumstances where it relied on income...

    13 November 2019

    KWM acted for CSIRO in successfully defending a $1.3 million general protections claim brought by a former employee in the Federal Court. The allegations concerned her employment at CSIRO from 2012...

    07 November 2019

    Listed companies are subject to continuous disclosure obligations under the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act) and the ASX Listing Rules. Some of the principles underpinning those continuous disclosure...

    28 October 2019

    The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (the Commission) has recently cited difficulties in proving that some mergers would result in a breach of Australian competition laws as part of a...

    23 October 2019

    This site uses cookies to enhance your experience and to help us improve the site. Please see our Privacy Policy for further information. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive these cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

    For more information on which cookies we use then please refer to our Cookie Policy.