Insight,

China Adopts New Thresholds for Merger Filings

CN | EN
Current site :    CN   |   EN
Australia
China
China Hong Kong SAR
Japan
Singapore
United States
Global

Tag:corporate-mergers-and-acquisitions-antitrust-and-competition-law

On January 26, 2024, the State Council published the Provisions of the State Council on the Standard for Notification of Concentration of Business Operators (2024 Amendment) (“New Thresholds for Notification ”). The New Thresholds for Notification  was passed by the State Council on December 29, 2023 and would take effect on January 26, 2024.  Please see below a few highlights of the New Standard of Notification.

I. Turnover Thresholds are Significantly Increased

The New Thresholds for Notification  has significantly increased the turnover thresholds for merger filings. Specifically, concentration that meets the following thresholds shall be notified to and cleared by the State Administration for Market Regulation (“SAMR”) prior to closing: [1]

It is worth noting that the draft for public consultation of the New Thresholds for Notification  introduced a set of notification standard that targeted killer acquisitions. Specifically, a transaction that satisfies the following conditions will need to be notified to SAMR:

  • The Chinese turnover of one of the concentrating parties exceeds RMB 100 billion (approx. USD 14.19 billion/ EUR 13.08 billion) in the preceding fiscal year; and
  • The market capitalization (or valuation) of the merging party or the target company is not less than RMB 800 million (approx. USD 113.53 million/ EUR 104.68 million), and its turnover in China in the preceding fiscal year accounted for more than one-third of its global turnover.

The published version of the New Thresholds for Notification  has not adopted the above thresholds, which might be because there are controversies over how to determine the market capitalization or valuation of an enterprise, and therefore whether a concentration has met filing thresholds would be uncertain. Nevertheless, the above thresholds reflect SAMR’s strict scrutiny over “killer acquisitions” in China, which are also consistent with the global trend.

II. Transactions that do not Meet Filing Thresholds but may Exclude or Restrict Market competition may also be Subject to Merger Filings

The New Thresholds for Notification  emphasizes that if there is evidene to prove that a concentration of undertakings has or may have the effect of excluding or restricting competition, antitrust enforcement administration could require that such concentration be notified even if it has not met the filing thresholds as promulgated by the State Council.[2]

In determining which circumstances could be deemed as having the effect of excluding or restricting competition, the Antimonopoly Guidelines in the Field of Platform Economy (“Guidelines for Platform Economy”) and the Antimonopoly Guidelines in the Field of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (“Guidelines for API”) published and implemented in 2021 have provided the following guidance:

III. Application Time

The New Thresholds for Notification  will apply to transactions for which the agreements are signed after January 26, 2024. For transactions signed before January 26, 2024 but are not yet implemented, there has not been a formal guidance on the applicability of the new standard. We would suggest a case-by-case assessment and a pre-filing consultation with SAMR if necessary.

Scan the QR code to subscribe to "King & Wood Mallesons" for more information

Article 3, New Thresholds for Notification.

Article 4, New Thresholds for Notification .

Article 19(3), Guidelines for Platform Economy.

Reference

  • [1]

    Article 3, New Thresholds for Notification.

  • [2]

    Article 4, New Thresholds for Notification .

  • [3]

    Article 19(3), Guidelines for Platform Economy.

LATEST THINKING
Insight
Data misuse and data breaches are the two core risks of data security. Data misuse can be prevented through strict legal regulations that ensure standardized data processing. compliance and regulatory-cybersecurity and data compliance,telecommunications media entertainment and technology-data protection and privacy

28 April 2025

Insight
On March 19, 2025, the Chinese Zhangjiagang Court ruled in a recent AIGC copyright infringement case Feng v. Dongshan Company that, the plaintiff's AI-generated pictures lacked enough original authorship to be copyrightable and that the prompts were not copyrightable either.[1] Unlike the previous AIGC copyrightability cases where the local Chinese courts recognized the original authorship in the AI-generated work, this is the first Chinese case under which AI-generated pictures were denied copyright protection.intellectual property-trademarks and copyright,digital economy,artificial intelligence

25 April 2025

Insight
On 28 November 2024, the newly amended Supervision Law of the People's Republic of China was adopted by the Standing Committee of China's National People's Congress (NPC) and is set to take effect on 1 June 2025. This amendment focuses on strengthening the oversight and restrictions on supervisory powers, with an emphasis on safeguarding citizens' rights. Dispute Resolution & Litigation-Compliance and Corporate Governance

21 April 2025