Publication,

Promoting greater usage of electronic contracts and electronic signatures under Australian law

AU | EN
Current site :    AU   |   EN
Australia
China
China Hong Kong SAR
Japan
Singapore
United States
Global

Parties are increasingly entering into transactions and contracts electronically (whether by typing their names on documents via emails, signing with a stylus on a tablet, clicking a click to accept button within a computer browser, or electronic signing via a cloud platform such as DocuSign eSignature).

These methods are accepted by businesses and Australian courts alike as a valid, secure and efficient way of doing business in Australia.

While Australian law generally and broadly recognises that contracts can be reliably signed by electronic means, there currently are specific areas where particular uncertainties remain: signing deeds, signing by companies and witnessing. Such uncertainties in these areas largely arise because the law unfortunately has not kept pace with the progress of technology.  Many of the rules around signatures were created when contracts were signed on paper (eg "wet" signatures). Such rules continue to apply despite significant technological advances that provide for signatures to be even more reliable and secure through electronic means. These uncertainties impact the use of electronic signatures by imposing certain unnecessary additional costs and delays in doing business by requiring parties to sign contracts the old-fashioned way, with paper and ink.

This article outlines these very specific areas where uncertainties remain that negatively impact everyday business and how the Australian legal framework can be clarified in a simple manner to allow contracts to be entered into with electronic signatures  onsistently with the otherwise ubiquitous approach of electronic signatures in Australian's digital economy.

Check out our recent insights:

 

 

Download
Promoting greater usage of electronic contracts and electronic signatures under Australian law

Download

697KB, 7 Pages

LATEST THINKING
Insight
ast May, we wrote about the test case, Australian News Channel Pty Ltd v Isentia Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 363, in which the Honourable Justice Burley made findings regarding the scope of the Crown copyright exception in section 183 of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Section 183 permits the use of copyright material by federal, state and territory governments for ‘the services of the Commonwealth or a State’, subject to an obligation to pay reasonable compensation.

22 May 2025

Insight
The Productivity Commission is now inviting feedback from industry stakeholders as part of the second phase of its ongoing inquiries into the five pillars of productivity.

21 May 2025

Insight
Leave entitlements can be deceptively complex. Although the average employee is well aware of their entitlement to four or five weeks off each year for annual leave, and 10 days for personal leave, operationalising that entitlement in a payroll system in the form of leave accruals can cause a headache for employers.

21 May 2025