Insight,

Investing in China’s ‘internet hospitals’: twists, turns and why structure matters

AU | EN
Current site :    AU   |   EN
Australia
Belgium
China
China Hong Kong SAR
Germany
Italy
Japan
Singapore
Spain
UAE
United Kingdom
United States
Global

Covid provoked a surge worldwide in the use of technology to deliver healthcare services and products. In China, the number of ‘internet hospitals’ – the local label for healthcare services and products provided online – increased to more than 1,600 by the middle of 2021 according to official statistics released by National Health Commission (NHC).[1]

Technology development, market incentives and favorable policies have helped to drive the trend in China. This emerging industry has triggered foreign investors’ interest but accessing the market is not always easy, especially considering the strategic importance of the healthcare industry.[2]

Foreign investors have faced resistance from local authorities and internet hospitals may have to comply with restrictions imposed on telecommunications businesses.

In this insight, we explore:

  • major legal obstacles foreign investors may face in their access to the market, and
  • potential pathways to overcome these obstacles.

Regulatory settings: a recent timeline

China takes a ‘catalogue’ approach to foreign investment. Depending on which catalogue an industry, sector or service sits in, investments are either encouraged, restricted or prohibited. Medical institutions have moved between catalogues over time, creating uncertainty.

Full ban
Initially
, authorities adopted in principle a full ban on foreign investment in medical institutions in the form of Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprise (WFOE).

Joint ventures allowed
In 2000, under the Interim Measures for the Administration of Sino-Foreign Equity and Cooperative Joint Venture Medical Institutions (中外合资、合作医疗机构管理暂行办法 in Chinese), the ratio of equity or rights and interests by foreign investors in a medical institution was capped at 70%. This cap remains in effect.

Pilot scheme in seven cities/provinces allows WOFE set-up
In 2014
 the restrictive attitude towards WOFE was substantially altered by the Pilot Scheme for the Establishment of Wholly Foreign-Owned Hospitals (关于开展设立外资独资医院试点工作的通知 in Chinese),[3] released by the National Health and Family Planning Commission[4] and Ministry of Commerce. This permitted the set-up of WFOE medical institutions[5] through new establishment or acquisition in seven cities (provinces), including Beijing, Tianjin, Jiangsu and Hainan.

Restricted catalogue limits to equity or cooperative JVs
In 2015 
this came to a halt on the release of the Catalogue of Industries for Guiding Foreign Investment (Revision 2015) (外商投资产业指导目录(2015年修订) in Chinese). It shifted medical institutions from the permitted catalogue back to the restricted one,[6] and emphasised that medical institutions can only take the form of equity or cooperative joint venture – expressly excluding the form of WFOE.

Negative lists cement restrictions
The same re-tightened rationale has followed in negative lists as applied on both national and Free Trade Zone levels since.[7]

In principle, foreign investment in medical institutions is still therefore limited to joint ventures, with a cap of 70% foreign capital contribution.

Theoretically, this should cover internet hospitals as a type of medical institution. Although it is not possible to wholly own an internet hospital (in the form of WFOE), investment by way of a joint venture should be feasible.

Yet in practice, as noted above, indications and actions from local authorities suggest this is not the case. Promisingly, a few governmental officials have indicated they may grant approval in the future.

Investing in value-added telecommunication businesses

Business operations based on the use of the internet are usually subject to qualifications related to value-added telecommunications, and internet hospitals are no exception. Compared with the medical institution sector, foreign investors have faced more stable restrictions, such as a foreign capital contribution capped at 50% in general.[8]

Depending on the business model of internet hospitals, two specific sub-business services of value-added telecommunication may apply:

  • B25 - Internet Content Provider, ICP
  • B21 - Electronic Data Interchange, EDI.

Notably, the general 50% foreign capital contribution limitation applies to ICPs, but not to EDIs in the field of e-commerce.[9]

While there is disagreement as to whether ICP/EDI registration is needed for internet hospitals, the prevailing practice is that most internet hospitals will apply for ICP or ICP & EDI (under a domestic entity as mentioned below). Companies with foreign investors may still face practical hurdles in applying for ICP registration.

Conclusion: prevailing structures and pioneering market players

Although foreign investors are not forbidden to invest in internet hospitals (the form of joint venture is legally feasible), subtle and dynamic limitations imposed by updating laws and policies in medical institutions and telco businesses are crucially important for investment structures involving foreign capital. More than that, inconsistent local practices of authorities may also impede opportunities.

The prevailing practice so far is that foreign investors will adopt a typical Variable Interest Entity (VIE) structure (common in the TMT sector) to set up internet hospital, that is:

  • establish and operate the internet hospital under a domestic entity which will have less trouble in applying for a medical institution license and value-added telecommunication license, and
  • put this domestic entity under contractual control of a foreign invested entity.

Certain market players are pioneering their way to directly set up joint venture internet hospitals by lobbying the local authorities. We are following these efforts with interest.   

Want to know more about China’s growing healthcare sector and the investment opportunities it brings? Our experts share their insights in other pieces from our series on the topic:

References

[1] Xinhua: China’s internet health services gathering steam amid COVID-19, August 24, 2021, issued on NHC’s official website, see http://en.nhc.gov.cn/2021-08/24/c_85005.htm.

[2] Personal health data generated in the healthcare industry matters when it comes to national security and personal privacy, as evident in China’s developing regulatory regimes relating to human genetic resources and personal information protection.

[3] Prior to this, signs of a positive attitude toward foreign investment in medical institutions were indicated by the Notice on Further Encouraging and Guiding Social Capital to Establish Medical Institutions (进一步鼓励和引导社会资本举办医疗机构意见的通知 in Chinese), promulgated by the State Council in 2010, which proposed gradually removing the cap on foreign investment in the medical institutions and permitting the establishment of WFOE medical institutions in pilot projects.

[4] The predecessor of NHC.

[5] It should be noted that medical institutions providing traditional Chinese medicine are excluded.

[6] In the Catalogue of Industries for Guiding Foreign Investment (Revision 2011) (外商投资产业指导目录(2011年修订) in Chinese), the medical institution sector is classified in the permitted catalogue.

[7] Up to now, the latest negative lists on the national level (i.e. Special Administrative Measures (Negative List) for Foreign Investment Access (Edition 2021) (外商投资准入特别管理措施(负面清单) (2021年版) in Chinese)) and the Free-Trade-Zone level (Special Administrative Measures (Negative List) for Foreign Investment Access in Pilot Free Trade Zones (Edition 2021) (自由贸易试验区外商投资准入特别管理措施 (负面清单) (2021年版) in Chinese)) both confine the form of medical institutions to joint venture alone.

[8] The Administrative Provisions on Foreign-invested Telecommunications Enterprises (外商投资电信企业管理规定 in Chinese), effective on February 6, 2016, provides that the ratio of foreign capital contribution in an enterprise operating value-added telecommunications businesses shall not exceed 50%. The Special Administrative Measures (Negative List) for Foreign Investment Access (Edition 2021) adopts the same rule.

[9] See the Circular of Lifting Restrictions on the Proportion of Foreign Equity in Online Data Processing and Transaction Processing Business (for-profit E-commerce) by Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (工业和信息化部关于放开在线数据处理与交易处理业务(经营类电子商务)外资股比限制的通告 in Chinese).

LATEST THINKING
Insight
In fulfilment of key Labor election promises, legislation was introduced into the Federal Parliament today to make unfair contract terms illegal and raise maximum penalties for breach of competition and consumer laws.

28 September 2022

Insight
The Federal Government has today introduced a bill to implement a further seven of the recommendations of the [email protected] Report (Bill), as well as making a number of other changes.

27 September 2022

Insight
Nearly 2 years of record-breaking public M&A activity in Australia has put pressure on Boards to respond to changing tactics from increasingly aggressive bidders.

27 September 2022