Insight,

ICLG Securitisation 2018: Guide To Australian, Hong Kong and PRC Law

AU | EN
Current site :    AU   |   EN
Australia
Belgium
China
China Hong Kong SAR
Germany
Italy
Japan
Singapore
Spain
UAE
United Kingdom
United States
Global

Drawing on our deep understanding of debt capital markets and local conditions, and with our history of acting on landmark securitisation transactions in Australia and Asia, we have authored three chapters in The International Comparative Legal Guide (ICLG) Securitisation 2018.

The ICLG Securitisation 2018 provides a practical cross-border insight into common issues in securitisation laws and regulations – including receivables contracts, receivables purchase agreement, asset sales, security issues, insolvency laws, special rules, regulatory issues and taxation. We are proud to have contributed to this year's guide, further demonstrating the strength of our Securitisation law practice and our deep understanding of the law in this area.

Please click on the links below to download Australia, Hong Kong and China chapters or contact one of the authors if you have any questions.

Jurisdiction

Authors

Download Australia chapter

Anne-Marie Neagle, Ian Edmonds-Wilson

Download Hong Kong chapter

Paul McBride, Darwin Goei

Download China chapter

Zhou Jie, Eddie Hu

The complete ICLG is available at www.iclg.co.uk.

Find out more about how you can benefit from our Securitisation knowledge and expertise.

LATEST THINKING
Insight
On 2 August 2022, the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment (Royal Commission Response) Bill 2022 was passed (Aged Care Bill), introducing important regulatory changes to Australia’s aged care sector. The Bill makes numerous legislative amendments, including to the Aged Care Act 1997 (Cth) (Aged Care Act) and the Aged Care (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997 (Cth) (Transitional Provisions Act), and responds to various recommendations made by the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety (Royal Commission) Final Report (Report). The Report identified the provision of substandard aged care services and perceived systemic failures in the aged care sector.[1]

08 August 2022

Insight
The Federal Court has refused an application to stay proceedings to quantify compensation for patent infringement (quantum proceedings) pending the outcome of separate parallel proceedings challenging the validity of the infringed patent on new grounds. The case is significant as intellectual property cases are regularly bifurcated with liability determined separately damages or an account of profits. A patentee may also bring consecutive infringement cases and therefore have two separate cases considering invalidity issues for the same patent running in parallel.

03 August 2022

Insight
Since the introduction of a nationwide Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH) system in 2019, licenses have linked directly to therapeutic products rather than manufacturers.

03 August 2022