Publication,

Global Legal Insights - A guide to Australia's merger control regime

AU | EN
Current site :    AU   |   EN
Australia
Belgium
China
China Hong Kong SAR
Germany
Italy
Japan
Singapore
Spain
UAE
United Kingdom
United States
Global

​This publication was written by Sharon Henrick and Wayne Leach

An introduction to Australia's merger control regime

Australia's merger control regime is contained in the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (the CCA), and is primarily administered by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) through an informal process. The Australian Competition Tribunal has a limited role to play in the regime.

The regime is voluntary and non-suspensory. It is not subject to turnover thresholds and does not contain a mandatory notification procedure.

In practice, the ACCC's extensive investigatory powers and ability to apply to the Federal Court of Australia for urgent interlocutory relief, including for orders to delay completion of mergers, and the Australian Foreign Investment Review Board's practice of contacting the ACCC to ask it if it has any competition concerns with acquisitions notified to the Australian Federal Treasurer under Australia's foreign investment rules, mean that the Australian regime usually functions as if it is mandatory and suspensory.

The ACCC co-operates with other competition law agencies, as a result of MOUs, bilaterals and other arrangements. The extent and frequency of the co-operation appears to be increasing and, in some cases, may mean that the ACCC delays making a decision on a transaction notified in other jurisdictions until other agencies (such as the DoJ or the EC) have made their decision.

The ACCC's policy is to further investigate proposed acquisitions:

  • that would result in the acquirer having a market share of 20% or more; and
  • where the products of the parties are either economic substitutes or complements.

The basis for the policy is that where an acquisition of shares or assets meets these requirements, it may have the potential to raise concerns under section 50 of the CCA. Section 50 of the CCA prohibits acquisitions of shares or assets that would have the effect, or be likely to have the effect, of substantially lessening competition in a market in Australia.


For more information on Australia's merger control regime, visit Global Legal Insights or download the Australia chapter below. 

Contents include: 

  • Key features of Australia's merger control regime
  • Overview of merger control activity during the last 12 months under the informal merger review process
  • New developments in jurisdictional assessment or procedure
  • Priority sectors
  • Key economic appraisal techniques applied e.g. as regards unilateral effects and co-ordinated effects, and the assessment of vertical conglomerate mergers
  • Approach to remedies and impact on process and timing
  • Key policy developments
  • Reform proposals.
LATEST THINKING
Insight
On 2 August 2022, the Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment (Royal Commission Response) Bill 2022 was passed (Aged Care Bill), introducing important regulatory changes to Australia’s aged care sector. The Bill makes numerous legislative amendments, including to the Aged Care Act 1997 (Cth) (Aged Care Act) and the Aged Care (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997 (Cth) (Transitional Provisions Act), and responds to various recommendations made by the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety (Royal Commission) Final Report (Report). The Report identified the provision of substandard aged care services and perceived systemic failures in the aged care sector.[1]

08 August 2022

Insight
The Federal Court has refused an application to stay proceedings to quantify compensation for patent infringement (quantum proceedings) pending the outcome of separate parallel proceedings challenging the validity of the infringed patent on new grounds. The case is significant as intellectual property cases are regularly bifurcated with liability determined separately damages or an account of profits. A patentee may also bring consecutive infringement cases and therefore have two separate cases considering invalidity issues for the same patent running in parallel.

03 August 2022

Insight
Since the introduction of a nationwide Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH) system in 2019, licenses have linked directly to therapeutic products rather than manufacturers.

03 August 2022