Treasury released its Sustainable Finance Strategy Consultation Paper (Strategy) on 2 November 2023, signalling a significant transition for the Australian sustainable finance industry from being largely market-led to a government-led approach.
The Strategy acknowledges the market’s increasing focus on climate and sustainability issues and proposes a range of measures to underpin the development of Australia’s sustainable finance market. This includes a sustainable finance taxonomy, new labelling laws for marketing investment products, globally-consistent climate disclosures and the issuance of sovereign green bonds from mid-2024.
This development comes almost one year after Australian Treasurer Jim Chalmers announced plans to pursue “a more ambitious and coordinated” strategy in 2023.
Treasury is seeking feedback from the industry by 1 December 2023. If you’d like assistance preparing feedback, we’d be delighted to help. Feel free to contact the authors below.
In this insight, we detail the policy priorities set out in the Strategy – and the specific feedback requested.
The Strategy will help mobilise the private investment needed in coming decades, enable Australian firms to access the capital needed to finance their own transitions and take advantage of new opportunities that arise, and ensure that the financial opportunities and risks presented by climate change are identified and well managed.
The Strategy, Executive Summary
- The Australian government (via Treasury) is consulting on landmark proposals to shift from a market-led approach to sustainable finance, to a government-led approach
- Feedback is due by 1 December 2023
- There are more than 20 points of feedback sought including:
- How government and regulators can support business to build climate disclosure capabilities
- The use cases for a taxonomy
- Designing a sustainable investment product labelling regime
- How to mobilise private sector funds towards sustainability solutions in the Indo-Pacific region
- Whether there is a case for regulating ESG ratings as financial services
- How regulators can improve market-wide understanding of sustainability finance.
Three pillars are key to achieving these objectives
- Improve transparency on climate and sustainability: ensure market participants can identify sustainability-related risks, opportunities, impacts and plans clearly and compare and understand them.
- Financial system capabilities: Australia’s financial system regulators and other stakeholders are already playing a part in an efficient sustainable finance ecosystem. The Government is seeking to support this momentum and ensure firms, financial institutions and regulators strengthen their sustainability-related capabilities.
- Australian Government leadership and engagement: the Government aims to take a leading role in supporting the development of the sustainable finance market, aligning Australia’s capital markets with international standards and shaping global developments.
The Strategy details 12 policy priorities
There are four policy priorities detailed for each of the three pillars, including complementary priorities, initiatives and reform options. The Government is seeking specific feedback on each of the policy priorities by 1 December 2023.
Pillar 1: Improve Transparency on Climate and Sustainability
Priority 1: Establish a framework for sustainability-related financial disclosure
Proposed approach
- Implement mandatory climate-related financial disclosure requirements for large companies and financial institutions.
- Closely monitor the development of other international sustainability-related financial disclosure framework and standards.
- ASIC may consider updating guidance in relation to voluntary nature-related disclosure.
For feedback
- What are the opportunities for Government, regulators and industry to support companies to develop the required skills, resources and capabilities to make climate disclosures under the proposed new obligations?
- How should the Government, regulators and industry prepare for global developments in sustainability-related financial disclosure frameworks and standards, including the TNFD?
Priority 2: Develop a sustainable finance taxonomy
Proposed approach
- The initial development phase:
- Led by the Australian Sustainable Finance Institute (ASFI) with oversight by the Council of Financial Regulators (CFR) Climate Working Group.
- The key output will be a set of preliminary taxonomy criteria for assessing how activities are aligned with climate mitigation objectives for key Australian economic sectors.
- The development phase:
- Transition to net zero will require some ongoing investment in higher-emitting activities that have credible pathways to reduce emissions and provide critical inputs to more sustainable products. It also involves complex scientific assessment and difficult judgment.
- The taxonomy will assess the most promising options for incorporating transition into an Australian framework.
- Further development:
- Treasury and the CFR will consider options for embedding the taxonomy in the regulatory architecture.
- Medium-term options include: requiring large firms to disclose the degree of alignment of their activities with taxonomy and requiring financial entities to disclose the degree of alignment of their investment products or portfolios with taxonomy.
- It is likely that a legislative approach will give more force to the taxonomy’s use cases.
- Permanent government arrangements:
- The taxonomy should be overseen and maintained by an appropriate government body of agency once the initial phase of taxonomy development is complete.
For feedback
- What are the most important policy priorities and use cases for an Australian sustainable finance taxonomy? What are the key insights from international experience to date?
- What are priorities for expanding taxonomy coverage after the initial focus on climate mitigation objectives in key sectors?
- What are appropriate long-term government arrangements to ensure that the taxonomy is effectively embedded in Australian’s financial and regulatory architecture?
Priority 3: Support credible net zero transition planning
Proposed approach
- In line with ISSB standards, the Government’s proposed mandatory disclosure requirements will require transition plans to be disclosed, including information about climate-related targets and progress towards these targets, and any mitigation strategies.
- The Government is accelerating and coordinating investments in other policy frameworks, including the development of national sectoral emissions reduction pathways as part of Australia’s 2050 Net Zero Plan and the development of the sustainable finance taxonomy sustainability objectives.
- The Government does not intend to introduce transition planning disclosure requirements that go beyond ISSB-aligned standards in the near term.
- In 2024, Treasury will work with the CFR to provide updated recommendations on further steps, beyond ISSB-aligned disclosure requirement.
For feedback
- What are key gaps in Australian capability and practice, including relative to ‘gold standard’ approaches to transition planning developed through the TPT and other frameworks?
- To what extent will ISSB-aligned corporate disclosure requirements improve the transparency and credibility of corporate transition planning? What additional transition disclosure requirements or guidance would be most useful in the medium-term?
- Are there related priorities and opportunities for supporting enhanced target setting and transition planning for nature and other sustainability issues?
Priority 4: Develop a labelling system for investment products marketed as sustainable
Proposed approach
- The Government will legislate to create a labelling regime for investment products marketed as ‘sustainable’ or similar, including for managed funds and within superannuation.
- The Government intends to standardise the use of sustainability terminology by setting minimum standards for what qualifies for a prescribed sustainability label. Investment product issuers would also be required to provide retail investors with additional information, i.e., how sustainability is incorporated into the investment process, both pre-contractually and on a periodic basis.
- Treasury will commence work on this reform in 2024.
For feedback
- What should be the key considerations for the design of a sustainable investment product labelling regime?
- How can an Australian model build off existing domestic approaches and reflect key developments in other markets?
Pillar 2: Financial System Capabilities
Priority 5: Enhancing market supervision and enforcement
Proposed approach
- The Government will continue to support ASIC’s capacity to supervise and address market misconduct as it relates to sustainable finance, including to target greenwashing, building on additional resourcing provided to AISC to accelerate this work in 2023-24.
- The Government will consider feedback on whether ESG rating should be captured by financial services regulation, comparably to credit ratings agencies.
For feedback
- Are Australian’s existing corporations and financial services laws sufficiently flexible to address greenwashing? What are the priorities for addressing greenwashing?
- Is there a case for regulating ESG ratings as financial services?
Priority 6: Identifying and responding to potential systemic financial risks
Proposed approach
- Led by ARPA, the CFR will continue to expand its work on climate- and sustainability-related financial risks, deepening risk management capabilities and practices, including applying the CFR’s Climate Vulnerability Assessment process to the household insurance sector.
- APRA will continue to engage with financial institutions and other agencies and industry to better understand climate-related risks and risk management processes.
- Complementary work is underway across the other CFR agencies for instance, the RBA considers how climate change affects its monetary policy and financial stability responsibilities; the Government has restored Treasury’s capability to model climate opportunities and risks.
For feedback
- Are there specific areas where the Government or regulators could further contribute to market-wide understanding of systemic sustainability related risks, including climate-related financial risks?
Priority 7: Addressing data and analytical challenges
Proposed approach
- The Government will continue to work with and seek feedback from investors and industry stakeholders to improve the availability and quality of sustainability-related data:
- Improving data sources and analytical tools in priority sectors.
- Strengthening the measurement of natural capital.
- Investing in high quality climate information and services.
- Issues highlighted in initial stakeholder engagement include:
- The estimation of scope 3 emissions in large and complex supply chains, sectors or portfolios.
- Consistent and accessible understanding of climate scenarios and decarbonisation pathways across economies, sectors and industries, and how they affect individual sectors or firms.
- Access to reliable and comparable sustainability data beyond emissions.
- The availability of corporate sustainability data.
For feedback
- What are the priorities for ensuring that data-related initiatives already underway are tailored to meet the needs of firms and investors?
- What key sustainability data gaps or uncertainties faced by financial institutions in Australia should be prioritised by the CFR?
Priority 8: Ensuring fit for purpose regulatory frameworks
Proposed approach
- Financial regulation frameworks: the Government has supported financial regulators’ work to integrated sustainability considerations consistent with the existing legislative mandates; and will seek feedback on the possible longer-term direction of prudential policy frameworks in the face of climate change and sustainability risks.
- The superannuation system: the Government acknowledges the importance of the performance test to hold trustees to account for member returns; and will continue to explore further changes to improve the sophistication of the test to scrutinise underperformance across superannuation products.
- Investor stewardship: the Government is seeking feedback on reforms to support more effective and transparent investor stewardship, including for superannuation trustees and collective investment fund operators.
For feedback
- Do you agree that existing regulatory and governance frameworks and practices have adapted well to support better integration of sustainability-related issues in financial decision making? Are there barriers or challenges that require further consideration? This may include corporate governance obligations, prudential frameworks and oversight, regulation of the superannuation system and managed investment schemes etc.
- What steps could the Government or regulators take to support effective investor stewardship?
Pillar 3: Australian Government Leadership and Engagement
Priority 9: Issuing Australian sovereign green bonds
Proposed approach
- The Australian Office of Financial Management (AOFM) will be issuing green bonds. The first issuance of the Government’s sovereign green bond program is expected in mid-2024.
- Over time, green bonds are expected to support projects that address climate change mitigation and adaptation, along with natural resources depletion, loss of biodiversity and air and water pollution.
For feedback
- What are the key expectations of the market around issuance of, and reporting against, sovereign green bonds? What lessons can be learned from comparable schemes in other jurisdictions?
- What other measures can the Government take to support the continued development of green capital markets in Australia?
Priority 10: Catalysing sustainable finance flows and markets
Proposed approach
- Clean Energy Finance Corporation (CEFC), the largest government-owned green bank in the world, continues to be at the forefront of the Government’s efforts to drive Australia’s energy transformation, inducing as financing agent to deliver the $20 billion Rewiring the Nation program.
- CEFC will support the delivery of the Strategy by expanding its discounted financing across priority sectors and market segments, contributing to the development phase of the sustainable finance taxonomy, and contributing to the development phase of energy assessment tools for financial product applicability and consistency with sustainable finance best practice.
For feedback
- What role can the CEFC play to support scaling up of sustainable investment in Australia, as part of a more comprehensive and ambitious sustainable finance agenda?
- What are the key barriers and opportunities for the CEFC to support financing and market development in areas with significant climate co-benefits, including nature and biodiversity?
Priority 11: Promoting international alignment
Proposed approach
- Australia will continue to support the development of consistent global standards, and seek to maximise alignment of sustainable finance frameworks across different jurisdictions.
- Multilateral engagement will be complemented by a scaled-up focus on bilateral and regional mechanisms to promote knowledge sharing, capability development and interoperability.
For feedback
- What are the key priorities for Australia when considering international alignment in sustainable finance?
Priority 12: Position Australia as a global sustainability leader
Proposed approach
- The Government will promote sustainable finance as key pillar of ambitious international engagement on climate and nature.
- Australia will continue to support innovative financing models and approaches including blended finance models.
- Australia will also expend the direct Government-led financing efforts to support regional sustainability priorities.
For feedback
- What are other key near-term opportunities for Australia to position itself as a global leader in sustainable finance and global climate mitigation and adaptation?
- What are some longer-term international sustainability goals for Australia where sustainable finance can play a role?
- What are the key market, regulatory and institutional barriers to increasing private sector engagement in blended financing opportunities? How can these barriers be overcome?
- What are other means to mobilise private sector finance towards sustainability solutions in the Indo-Pacific region?
What next?
We are watching developments as they unfold and will keep you updated. See our Green & Social Capital insights for more, including: