The Housing Statement ambition is up to 800,000 new homes in the next decade, increasing to 2.2 million by 2051. The Housing Statement continues the focus of precinct planning in the growth areas of Melbourne but contains a renewed focus on densification in established Melbourne. Available detail is still fairly slim but the key reforms and actions announced include:
This table is also available for download in landscape as a PDF.
DETAILS
|
INDIVIDUAL
|
Example
uses 2
|
|
Clearing the permit backlog and red tape reforms
|
Clearing the backlog of 1,400 housing permit applications that have been stuck with councils for more than six months by:
Cutting red tape by:
|
|
|
Planning fast-track for projects with affordable housing
|
Expanding Victoria’s Development Facilitation Program (speeding up approval process from 1-2 years to 4 months) by:
|
|
|
Inner Melbourne growth via activity centres, priority precincts and office to resi conversion
|
|
|
|
Supporting institutional investment
|
Commitment to establish an Institutional Investment Framework to enable institutional investors like superannuation funds or insurance companies to invest in build-to-rent and build-to-sell projects. |
|
|
Funding for affordable and social housing
|
In addition to the investment underway in the Big Housing Build:
|
|
|
Renters' rights
|
Some strengthening of renters' rights, however nothing likely to substantially affect institutional investment:
|
|
|
Urban renewal and development opportunities
|
|
|
|
Future planning reforms
The Government has also flagged long term planning reforms for a modern, fit-for purpose planning system, including:
- updating Plan Melbourne (2017 – 2050) – Melbourne’s strategy for growth to reflect updated strategic priorities; and
- review and rewrite the Planning and Environment Act 1987 to build a modern, fit-for-purpose planning system. Government will review and establish and clarify timeframes for decisions, as well as looking at the roles and responsibilities in the planning system – including councils, the Minister for Planning, the Victorian Planning Authority and the Department of Transport and Planning.
The Planning Institute of Australia (Vic) (PIA(Vic)) also held a member briefing yesterday on its recent report Better Places, Better Housing: A Planning Reform Agenda (this can be accessed here). The paper outlines key priorities for reform as well as the challenges of achieving planning reform and increased density in established Melbourne. The longer-term reforms of the Victorian system to achieve the goals of the Housing Statement will require community ‘buy-in’ and education to maintain the social licence for these changes. PIA (Vic)’s four key priorities and recommendations are (in summary):
- Better strategic planning and prioritisation – compelling strategic plans at regional and metropolitan scale, greater community engagement upfront and then less complex and more efficient planning controls (greater use of codified assessment and approval)
- Fit of purpose planning governance - new Metropolitan and Regional Planning Authorities and re-aligning planning responsibilities to the appropriate geographic level with greater certainty as to state, metropolitan/regional and local levels of significance
- Greater government intervention to support development outcomes - including aggregating land for efficient and orderly development, strategic housing development (including social and affordable housing) and de-risking the development of diverse housing in greenfield and urban renewal areas (an enhanced role for Development Victoria or a new Victoria development corporation)
- Harnessing development contributions and development rights for housing and liveability – fit for purpose local infrastructure charges and value capture mechanism building on existing tools of development and infrastructure contributions and GAIC, a social and affordable housing contribution recognising its role as critical infrastructure.
Many of these PIA reform recommendations will form part of the planning reform debate. We will continue to follow these planning and property reforms as they develop.