Publication,

AI Guides | AI & Liability

AU | EN
Current site :    AU   |   EN
Australia
China
China Hong Kong SAR
Japan
Singapore
United States
Global

Who is liable when AI fails?

In the 1980s, the Therac-25 radiation system delivered at least 6 fatal or near-fatal doses of radiation to cancer patients. This was due, in part, to a glitch in the computer coding. There were also issues with the design of the system. Further problems were introduced when the system was upgraded at various hospitals. The
correct apportionment of liability is still debated today. So far, in Australia, the legislative focus has been on regulating liability for limited and specific forms of AI, such as autonomous cars and drones. There is no legislation dealing with liability for damage caused by AI generally.

Our experts look at regulating liability for different forms of AI in Australia.

Download
AI Guides: AI & Liability
Our experts look at regulating liability for different forms of AI in Australia.

Download

844KB, 1 Pages

LATEST THINKING
Insight
With sophisticated investors quickly seeking diversification in response to geopolitical risk, Asia Pacific markets are well-positioned to become an attractive hedge.

17 April 2025

Insight
Australia and the Asia Pacific Region emerge as a hotbed for data centre investment, as the AI revolution and resulting demand for digital infrastructure surges.

17 April 2025

Insight
A short primer on the different approaches being taken to financial covenants in leveraged finance deals

17 April 2025