Publication,

AI Guides | AI & Liability

AU | EN
Current site :    AU   |   EN
Australia
China
China Hong Kong SAR
Japan
Singapore
United States
Global

Who is liable when AI fails?

In the 1980s, the Therac-25 radiation system delivered at least 6 fatal or near-fatal doses of radiation to cancer patients. This was due, in part, to a glitch in the computer coding. There were also issues with the design of the system. Further problems were introduced when the system was upgraded at various hospitals. The
correct apportionment of liability is still debated today. So far, in Australia, the legislative focus has been on regulating liability for limited and specific forms of AI, such as autonomous cars and drones. There is no legislation dealing with liability for damage caused by AI generally.

Our experts look at regulating liability for different forms of AI in Australia.

Download
AI Guides: AI & Liability
Our experts look at regulating liability for different forms of AI in Australia.

Download

844KB, 1 Pages

LATEST THINKING
Insight
The Australian National Audit Office’s (ANAO) has recently emphasised the importance of agencies having effective and specific AI governance frameworks. This was the key message coming out of the ANAO’s performance audit report on the ATO’s Governance of Artificial intelligence.

14 March 2025

Insight
We explain what a B Corp is, how to become a B Corp and some of the benefits and challenges of obtaining this certification.

13 March 2025

Insight
Following a period of consultation on rules to support the Government’s Omnibus Cyber Security and Critical Infrastructure package discussed here, 4 of the 6 proposed rules have now been registered.

13 March 2025